Interesting Article On Peter Nash

[shelly]

Chris, you posted it what are you thoughts.

[David Atkatz]

Lotsa luck!

[earlywynnfan]

Originally Posted by shelly

Chris, you posted it what are you thoughts.

He already gave his thoughts: He said it was "interesting."

[David Atkatz]

My third grade teacher told us never to describe anything as either "interesting," or "nice."

[travrosty]

this is one of those one sentence threads with no point again. third times the charm.

[thenavarro]

From the stuff I've read over the years, I think Halper and Nash must have been separated at birth. They both seem to be cut from the same cloth. Circus hucksters that draw/drew people in by their tales and yarns. Their respective motivation really doesn't matter to me, both have been alleged to be spurious.

Just because the messenger is a general deadbeat, doesn't mean that EVERY message they spout is false. Some of the best information is provided by the worst offenders.

[Big Dave]

I think Peter does an excellent job....and he has a lot of resources, of which many are of the human kind.

[shelly]

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan

He already gave his thoughts: He said it was "interesting."

Thanks Ken.

[drc]

An ancient proverb (written by me): "In a debate, proving wrong your opponent doesn't automatically mean you're right. In many debates, both sides are wrong."

[HOF Auto Rookies]

What is even the point of that 'article'...

[travrosty]

Originally Posted by HOF Auto Rookies

What is even the point of that 'article'...

there is no point other than the author trying to carry water for other people who aren't mentioned but are behind rehabilitating halper's name while trying to do the opposite to nash.

[chaddurbin]

startling how the views on nash differ between the card side and the autograph side.

edited to add: he might not be that savior if after reading his articles you want to sell your collection

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan

He already gave his thoughts: He said it was "interesting."

Ken, so you and David are a team? I didn't realize that. Now I understand your previous response to one of my posts. I guess I have to respect your having your buddy's back, even if inappropriate.

[earlywynnfan]

Originally Posted by Runscott

Ken, so you and David are a team? I didn't realize that. Now I understand your previous response to one of my posts. I guess I have to respect your having your buddy's back, even if inappropriate.

Help me here: is this a snide comment??

Feel free to peruse old posts, or PM David. We are definitely not a team. However, sometimes we agree on things. I just got done reading about you agreeing with him on another post; are you a team?

Please let me know where I've been inappropriate.

Ken

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by earlywynnfan

Help me here: is this a snide comment??

Feel free to peruse old posts, or PM David. We are definitely not a team. However, sometimes we agree on things. I just got done reading about you agreeing with him on another post; are you a team?

Please let me know where I've been inappropriate.

Ken

Your initial 'snide remark' post surprised me. Now that we've had a couple more exchanges, I'm wondering why I was surprised.

Goodbye Ken.