![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Who the hell are you, Shelly, to be accusing any one of any thing? You don't know anything "for a fact," whether the autographs are good or bad, or anything about the family's story. This is the second consignor you've pilloried, with no evidence at all. Thankfully, both consignors have the guts to stare you--and your vacuous accusations--down.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm guessing then that this isn't the feel good thread?
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not for the consignor.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry
Last edited by shelly; 05-01-2013 at 05:32 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This isn't Freemasonry, it's autograph collecting.
Dan, That line is an instant classic.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard, You just verified everything I've been saying. How can anyone prove they are fake after they were said to be authentic. If that is the case, then why has Shelly spent all this time trying to negate any findings? What in the world did I do to that man to deserve his constant criticism except defend what I know is true and accurate?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Over on HoS jetsticks said, "I'll listen to someone who has common sense but not to anyone else."
Anybody with a lick of common sense who sees these particular photos as a group should be skeptical, at the very least—even if they lack even a cursory knowledge of Ruth's signature. I also do not understand this comment: "As of today, neither Shelly nor has anyone else provided an alternative to this. I am putting them out there. No takers for authenticity? They must be real then because no one wants to look like a horse's ass when they are proven wrong!" I don't even know if there's a special Ruth authenticator out there (a la Frank Caiazzo), but send them on over to PSA or Simon or Keurajian or our own cloak 'n' dagger fellow and I don't think a single one will call any of them good. If there is really a significant number of people on here who think these are good and want to spend their hard earned money on them, well... I'm off to buy a nice inkjet printer and a Parker 51. Got student loans to pay. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |