REA catalog intro

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by GrayGhost

Yes it sure is. People need to just accept that there is a leap of faith in EVERY sold autograph, unless it was signed IN FRONT of you.

Got my dream book yesterday and have started looking. Wonderful job as always. GREAT stuff and catalog

Scott, I have bought autographs that I am certain are real;i.e-there was no leap of faith. I understand that some autographs will be sold with a very tiny 'step' of faith, but if it requires a 'leap', it shouldn't be purchased. If more of us were unwilling to 'leap' at such autographs, we'd have fewer forgeries out there.

Not saying you are doing this, but I have seen forum members use the 'leap of faith' argument to justify their own past mistakes.

[JimStinson]

Originally Posted by Runscott

Scott, I have bought autographs that I am certain are real;i.e-there was no leap of faith. I understand that some autographs will be sold with a very tiny 'step' of faith, but if it requires a 'leap', it shouldn't be purchased. If more of us were unwilling to 'leap' at such autographs, we'd have fewer forgeries out there.

Not saying you are doing this, but I have seen forum members use the 'leap of faith' argument to justify their own past mistakes.

BINGO !!!
_______________
jim@stinsonsports.com

[GrayGhost]

I don't have the lot number handy, but there is a Babe Ruth/Bob Meusel signed ball, where the Ruth looks awful. it could have been and "on field rush job" if u read the cool provenance, just looks awful.

Thoughts?