 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
04-15-2013, 10:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quite the opposite. As I posted a while back, there are variations among the "Ruth"s that I interpret as evidence of their being genuine. A practiced forger would not, I believe, show such variation--having worked hard to perfect his perfect Ruth.
Last edited by David Atkatz; 04-15-2013 at 10:37 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
| Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |
Threaded Mode