![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Cardboard Junkie; 04-11-2013 at 07:29 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nobody I know bought the Blue Old Mill but it did sell via H&S...sorry to hear you're feeling bad David.
Here are my Browns...thinking of selling one at auction soon but not sure. ![]() Cheers, John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WOW!!
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just two are brown, but if your person can make me look like Clooney send her number my way.
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, being a T206 addict who has collected the cards every which way possible over the last 20+ years (high grade, errors, rare backs, HOFers, SLers, etc)...i always come back to rare backs. i just love the various artwork of the different brands, and i love the chase of putting together a nice back run. the tuffer ones are super rare, which makes it a fun journey.
i've seen way too many high-grade examples that look too "short" to my eye, so i steer away from them. i'd only buy high grade cards that have full borders. as Jim B pointed out, either way, it's nice to have consistency in a collection. and most importantly, collect what you like. One final bit of advice...buy the card, not the holder. good luck! Last edited by MVSNYC; 04-11-2013 at 08:47 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how about a freak?
![]() Hands down, rare back....hands down ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm also building a set in VG TO VG-EX and also decided to try to find at least one good example of each back if I can. I know I might only get a low grade Drum, lenox or Broadleaf, but that I might pull a couple PSA 5 EPDG, Sovereign, or Polar Bears to keep my overall set grade up. I also decided to try to collect all of the SLs in Old Mill backs. If it was my perfect set I'd have an even distribution of each back, but that's not going to happen unless I hit the lottery. I guess to each their own, but I like the idea of my set really demonstrating the variety within the set and going higher grade/common back really fails to do that. I try to collect T206s, not just Piedmont and Sweet Caps.
__________________
N300: 11/48 T206: 175/524 E95: 24/25 E106: 4/48 E210-1: Completed December 2013 R319: 43/240 Last edited by AMBST95; 04-11-2013 at 09:32 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you aren't going to collect the whole set, (remember the monster usually wins
![]() Get the nicest ones you can, because in 20-30-40 years, your potential buyers will know who Walter Johnson, Cy Young, Nap Lajoie and Ty Cobb are...but Chappy Charles may not be appealing to anyone no matter what the extinct tobacco brand he's advertising says... And now I realize you already mentioned that you were looking at HoFers...I don't collect T206 because there are too many commons for my taste, and you cannot read the back to get any information about the players. (i grew up memorizing Topps cards) So I revise my answer to higher grade common backs , of HOFers ![]()
__________________
Thanks! Brian L Familytoad Ridgefield, WA Hall of Fame collector. Prewar Set collector. Topps Era collector. 1971 Topps Football collector. Last edited by familytoad; 04-11-2013 at 09:44 PM. Reason: Op already mentioned HOF |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
John, I like the backs, but can you post a scan of the fronts as well? Thanks. -Sean
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why not a higher grade with a qualifier for tape on back? | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-26-2012 04:52 PM |
Wtb/wtt: T206 cobbs in mid grade or higher | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2012 04:23 PM |
looking for a 56 Clemente white back in higher grade | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2011 03:37 PM |
WTB: T206 Persons, any back, SGC-graded 30 or higher | wolf2039 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-13-2010 01:55 PM |
Low Grade Rarer T206 Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2005 11:20 AM |