LOTG Results

[conor912]

Originally Posted by Bosox Blair

Hey Conor,

I really like the Leach - a beauty!

I grabbed a couple items including the T207 Wood:

Thanks. The corner wear is a little heavier than I usually like, but I think the colors and image quality more than make up for it. I'm pretty excited about it.

Great looking 207. That set has really been catching my eye lately. That Wood is just about as nice of a 2 as your ever going to see. Great pickup.

[npa589]

Does anyone see the Pay Online button? It doesn't show up in my account.

[tinkertoeverstochance]

The pay buttons just appeared. My winnings:

[tbob]

Lost a few the last day but my bid on this one stood up.

[conor912]

Originally Posted by tinkertoeverstochance

The pay buttons just appeared. My winnings:

Is that guys name Ernest Porn?

[tinkertoeverstochance]

I thought the same thing at first, but, I checked a few other cards of his collection in the auction and his last name was "Born."

Lee

[conor912]

Originally Posted by tinkertoeverstochance

I thought the same thing at first, but, I checked a few other cards of his collection in the auction and his last name was "Born."

Lee

I think it's funny the flip says "looking left", when in fact he's looking right. Is "looking left" the official designation of that card or is that a PSA screw-up?

[Bosox Blair]

Originally Posted by conor912

I think it's funny the flip says "looking left", when in fact he's looking right. Is "looking left" the official designation of that card or is that a PSA screw-up?

With N172 pose descriptions, there is a somewhat complicated system that goes something like this...when the reference is to a part of the subject's body, the description is from that perspective (ie. bat on left shoulder = the player's left shoulder...not on the viewer's left). However, in terms of other directions (ie. looking left, leaning left, etc.) it is described from the viewer's perspective...so Watch is looking to the viewer's left.

Get it ...I know, it is maybe unduly complicated...

(And in truth, the Burnam description is redundant, since there is only the one pose...no need for the distinction provided by the description.)

Cheers,
Blair