![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's what I thought at first too, but finally decided the seller is a giant!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not making any statements from personal experiences, I have gone against the grain several times on here and stand behind it and nobody has ever been rude to me for it. However, it seems the overwhelming opinion on here is that everything borderline with any issue at all is fake. While the Major Authenticators are not perfect and make mistakes, the autograph world is better for having some sort of authentication in place and they do eliminate a lot of high end forgeries. They get it right WAY more often than they get it wrong, but people love to make it seem like they are bumbling idiots. It just seems like when an authenticated signature is called into question, the popular thing to do is pretend you know more than the authenticators (and sometimes you do) and say things are bad. If we just posted things we knew were good and all agreed with the authenticator, then why post it?
Not bitter, it just seems that is the trend on here (malicious or innocent), post something borderline, call attention to it, and criticize the authenticators. Maybe thats a good thing, I dont know, but if that is the end game, you're not going to get many people to "take the bait", because the agenda is clear and its not "This thing is Good, the authenticators got it right". Just my opinion, Rhys |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Also, I disagree totally with your last sentence that I quoted above, even though I may very well be in the minority. In my opinion, most of the claims here that autographs are fake, have been totally warranted. There is no "borderline" - only real or forged. That's what a lot of people are missing. Is a really, really, really good forgery, "borderline"? No, it's fake, and has as much value as a terrible forgery.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Baseball card art/photo:gehrig 34 goudey or not gehrig 34 goudey.that is the question | Forever Young | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 31 | 12-20-2012 07:14 AM |
Slightly O/T: Did Lou Gehrig really have Lou Gehrig's Disease? | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-19-2010 11:37 AM |
Lou Gehrig Bat | Dodger Dog Mmm | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 07-28-2009 10:26 AM |
Lou Gehrig ? | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 07-14-2009 04:29 PM |
Gehrig, Cobb - Price Reduced Rogers Peet and Gehrig- W-UNC Sale | BKasarda | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-14-2009 11:01 AM |