Did my first crack and resubmit

[conor912]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

Absolutely no excuse for that.

Agreed. I think one grade in either direction on any given day is an acceptable window. Three means someone was not on their A game (or B or C games, for that matter).

[ullmandds]

I agree with others opinions...1 grade either way is ok...but that is kinda crazy!!!! I know SGC seems to be grading more leniently the last year or two...maybe trying to compete more w/PSA...dunno...but congrats!!!

[npa589]

I think it's a craps shoot with either. The only reason it may seem like PSA screws up more is due to the fact that they DO screw up "more", but, I would surmise that this is not in an increased percentage of screw-ups, but only in quantity. PSA palpably grades many more cards than SGC...


My guess is that on that Rudolph there is very slight paper loss on the back that is sometimes determined as paper loss, and other times viewed as normal wear. Or, there was an erased pencil mark?

.

[tothrk]

I can easily understand how this could happen. When my wife wakes up in the morning, she's a "2". By the time she's done getting ready to leave the house, she's a "5".

I'll most likely never be seen from again after this post so good luck with your collections.

[Ease]

Originally Posted by tothrk

I can easily understand how this could happen. When my wife wakes up in the morning, she's a "2". By the time she's done getting ready to leave the house, she's a "5".

I'll most likely never be seen from again after this post so good luck with your collections.

Post of the year candidate! Outstanding.

[EvilKing00]

always buy the card not the slab, and the card was deff an sgc 60, not the 30 first given. nice work.

[okmaybent@aol.com]

Originally Posted by tothrk

I can easily understand how this could happen. When my wife wakes up in the morning, she's a "2". By the time she's done getting ready to leave the house, she's a "5".

I'll most likely never be seen from again after this post so good luck with your collections.

Hilarious.

[bunst]

Originally Posted by npa589

My guess is that on that Rudolph there is very slight paper loss on the back that is sometimes determined as paper loss, and other times viewed as normal wear. Or, there was an erased pencil mark?

.

Since I bought it without seeing a back scan, I was expecting the back to be messed up. Pleasantly surprised that there was nothing wrong. No paper loss, erasures or marks. Took a chance and got lucky.