![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am going with that plan, whatever it brings.
![]()
__________________
It is what it is... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd have that taking a bath in 2 seconds.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree! But I understand him not doing it also. Never done it before and not really wanting to start with a card like that. My first one was a $20 card at best. I don't think I would have started with a expensive card as my first but I would throw a Wagner in now if I thought it would improve it. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The appeal is the back. Doc Crandall is not the value. Get the paper off and have a nice, clean, rare UZIT back! Last edited by deadballfreaK; 03-23-2013 at 10:51 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks guys. I do get it.
I just don't have your confidence or experience. I don't want to be the subject of a Net54 thread titled "Inexperienced Guy Screws Up Only Known Crandall Uzit" At some point in our lives we've all made something worse by trying to make it better... Doug
__________________
It is what it is... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dunk the card in hope of improving the back, especially since the back is the star.
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Awesome card !!! I've never soaked a card either, so I'd feel the same hesitation about doing it if I owned it. But I know others do it and the final result can make a big difference when it's done right.
Hi Ken- I'm not sure how to quote a portion of a comment, so I copy and paste it- but this part here: " The appeal is the back. Doc Crandall is not the value." I hold a different opinion, only because I look for tough combinations and find it to be a fun way to collect. In this case, because it's now the only confirmed Crandall/Uzit, Crandall being on the front is just as important as the Uzit back. This card is desireable to me because of the combination, not just because it has a Uzit back. That's just my take, there is no right or wrong way to collect. To each their own, but I agree with Jim that this card is very special. Sincerely, Clayton |
![]() |
Tags |
uzit |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can a T206 have both Red Hindu back and Uzit? | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-25-2012 06:19 PM |
WTB T206 Drum Back or Uzit | Blunder19 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-23-2009 09:51 AM |
F/S T206 UZIT Back | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2008 01:21 PM |
T206 Uzit back Joe Tinker PSA 4 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-01-2007 07:27 AM |
T206 Cobb w/ UZIT Back ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-11-2002 02:55 PM |