![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I give you full credit David, since George did not tell me about it,
![]() But I will admit George is a great resource on variations, errors and oddities. I would put this in the print defect grouping. I have a couple other 52 border irregularities like this one and there is a discussion of 52 variations in general in a recent thread in here |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Possible newly discovered T205 variation | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 12-12-2016 04:30 PM |
Help! Newly discovered multisport set! | Cardboard Junkie | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 05-20-2011 02:49 PM |
Another Newly Discovered Cubs Pennant | mjkm90 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 02-18-2011 05:04 AM |
Newly discovered Cubs pennant? | mjkm90 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-26-2011 07:25 PM |
Another newly discovered First baseball card WOW! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-22-2009 09:36 AM |