![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
My sentiments exactly. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thats the dumbest analogy ever.
when the violators arre already caught, not AT LARGE. It's not liek we dont know fo the psa and jsa screwups, they have been caught, proven and turned in. Just not prosecuted fairly like the rest. case in point. you catch two guys robbing the store, one white, one black, you bring them in, they book the black guy and let the white guy go. now does your analogy hold up? what you are saying is that we cant catch the psa or jsa screwups so lets let them all go. but we already caught them and reported them, its just that its selective ENFORCEMENT, not the fact that we cant catch them all so let's let the ones we do catch go. We DID catch psa and jsa, its just that its ebay picking winners and losers. I don't think you would have the same attitude if they delisted the psa and jsa fakes and kept the drew max fakes up? you wouldnt have a problem with that? It all comes down to whose ox is being gored. Just give me a good reason why psa and jsa fakes that have been proven to be fake deserve to remain up. you can't because you you like it that way. You like psa and jsa fakes. If you didn't , you would demand they come down the same as the rest. a fake is a fake is a fake. These fakes are being laid right at ebays doorstep, they just choose to ignore some because of their cozy relationships. So it's good i am not in law enforcement because I don't practive selective enforcement of the law? law enforcements job is to serve justice, which is suppose to be blind. two violators violating the same statute deserve equal treatment and justice under the law. not look one way for one and book the other. when the DA's brother in law gets his traffic ticket dismissed, when others have to pay, then that's a problem. But I guess you don't have a problem with that. I have had an EMR ask me for all the non psa and jsa fakes. what the heck is that? why protect companies who screwup and certify fakes. why are their fakes golden and something we shouldn't talk about and take proactive action with? Sacred cows for $$$$$$$$$$$$, power and other considerations in return for shutting up. Last edited by travrosty; 03-16-2013 at 06:40 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The point is this: This war you have with PSA and JSA has so warped your judgement and reasoning that you actually welcome the idea of unleashing thousands upon thousands of fakes into the marketplace out of pure spite.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And once again, Travis hijacks yet another thread with his incoherent ramblings about a white whale or strawberry ice cream.
Go start your own thread people can ignore. This is NOT about PSA or JSA.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession Last edited by Mr. Zipper; 03-16-2013 at 06:39 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
autographs don't have a race but they have an affiliation.
if you are affiliated with us (psa, jsa), then your autographs are protected on ebay. i would report all fakes no matter whose name or company is on them, and i would demand they ALL be taken down. no name is above being pulled as a FAKE. why is a psa or jsa fake somehow a better, higher-cut of an autograph than a fake by anyone else? its discrimination, no matter how you look at it. you can defend it or try to explain it away, but it's still there. some emr's deserve to be emr's some don't. i know an emr who knows nothing about autographs, but he is an emr. why? I don't know. other emr's sell a lot of autogrpah in their specialty on ebay, with disclaimers on their accounts to watch out for the OTHER sellers, who may sell fakes. and this guy gets to report to ebay the fakes he finds within that same specialty he sells for and promises coa's from the company he works for as well. that's what is screwed up about this whole deal. if ebay won't treat a proven fake as a fake and pull it, then it doesnt' deserve the support of emr's or anybody. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ebay should either start their own authentication service and require that all autographs be certed by team ebay, listing their authenticators on their website and making sure there are no conflicts of interest concerning these authenticators,
or they should let all autographs on ebay without pulling anything down, just requiring that any company's or individuals coa that is listed with an autograph be registered with ebay first. listed on their website, with a weblink so you can go to that companies or indiduals website page, with a photo of the guy who looked at your autograph, his address, phone number, email which all been verified before hand. this way the scammers will be reluctant to put their info down, and the rest will have their coa's up on ebay. and run a disclaimer in large print at the beginning of every autograph listing that be sure to visit the coa's website first, ask questions and be confident in the person or company that is issuing the coa. and that's it. if people are confident with someone you don't like. then let them be. that way an autograph can either be listed without authentication, or it can be listed with a coa that must be picked out of the registered list before it can be listed. if the company or person issuing the coa you have isnt registered with ebay, then you cant mention or list the coa. all autograph without authentication are buyer beware as well, and it should say that you should be confident with who you are buying from. only the people and companies who take the time to meet the requirements will be allowed to be listed, and some fakers might do it, but their names, addresses and other identifiable info will be posted for all to see, no more GFA's. if a coa is shown that isnt on the list, or a coa is listed that is a mismatch with the one shown, then one warning and after that, the seller is banned. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Travis, have you bothered to read the rest of this thread?
The point is, NO FAKE AUTOS ARE BEING TAKEN DOWN, regardless of who certed them. It's exactly what you've been screaming for: ALL AUTHENTICATORS ARE BEING TREATED THE SAME: they are ALL being given free reign on eBay! There is no preference being given by eBay to PSA, JSA or any other authenticator, and all alerts from emr's are being ignored. You should be dancing in the streets, not copy/pasting from your previous rants. The 50% of what you have typed that is coherent no longer applies! Last edited by thecatspajamas; 03-16-2013 at 08:18 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eBay Buyer Sued For Leaving Negative Feedback on $6.44 Item | michael3322 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-10-2012 01:18 PM |
the price of leaving a negative feedback on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 01-21-2007 05:27 AM |
If you don't mind the 19% commission... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-05-2005 10:41 PM |
out of commission... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-17-2004 04:02 PM |
Warning: SuperiorAuctions ---- 20% commission fee | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-26-2003 11:33 AM |