 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-06-2013, 07:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I would think that it is well documented there's a variance with the AB back and that each card looked at under magnification would be given the same treatment as far as looking at the edges for evidence of trimming, irregardless of the back.
__________________
N300: 11/48 T206: 175/524 E95: 24/25 E106: 4/48 E210-1: Completed December 2013 R319: 43/240 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
| BST Hypothetical to ponder | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 03-26-2010 09:38 AM |
| wtb Elmer Ponder Zeenuts | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2008 09:47 AM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
| Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |
Hybrid Mode
