A Real Shocker

[Runscott]

Okay...David.

Thanks for the note - I see what's happening, and my apologies. My posting the Lazzeri and Shocker signatures was NOT a shot at you. I can see how you would react the way you have, thinking I'm attacking you.

My problem is not with you, Chris, or anyone else who thinks this ball is good. It's not your jobs to authenticate the ball, or once authenticated, to sell it. My beef is with those people who are making money off of fellow-hobbyists, any way they can. It's sick.

We have a 'good' bad example in front of us, and yes, I'm going to beat it to death, one bite at a time. 'Gehrig' was the first bite, 'Lazzeri' was another, and 'Shocker' is the third. The ball itself was actually the first, but there are too many people who just look at it and think it looks good, despite the obvious problems. So yeah, I picked a few autographs that could easily be ripped to pieces based on really bad letters.

[RichardSimon]

Originally Posted by Runscott

My beef is with those people who are making money off of fellow-hobbyists, any way they can.

+1