![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Where do you think the value of a T206 Wet Sheet Tranfer should be"? | |||
Less than an example without "quality control issues." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.39% |
The same as cards without the extra "markings." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 12.12% |
A slight premium should apply; however, not raise the value dramatically. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 28.03% |
A moderate premium should apply. They are relatively scarce and should be valued accordingly. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.39% |
A significant premium should apply, given the supply of and demand for them. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.52% |
I simply do not care. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 29.55% |
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think they're a very interesting anomaly, particularly when I see them on
Tolstoi cards. I'd pay a small to medium premium. all the best, barry |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would (and have) paid a slight premium on them, because of their uniqueness. It all depends on the level of detail in the transfer and the situation. To me they are certainly in a separate category to ghost images and mis-prints, with the latter two commanding more of a premium. Great poll and discussion though.
Question; with the case of a WST from a different brand on a card, would people lean towards that happening at the time of production, or the case that Steve put forth, where conditions were just right (or wrong) and over time in storage the ink transferred over? I guess I would lean towards Steve's theory, but I am not too versed on how or where the different brands were produced (same factory, same time, different brand - see example below). Thanks! Bill |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It doesn't make sense that a sheet of Sweet Caps would be stacked on a sheet of Polar Bears, since the cards are going in different packs.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Wetsheet Transfers | MurrayMike78 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-28-2012 06:09 PM |
T206 offset transfers - A change of opinion | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-12-2012 08:55 AM |
t206 "wet transfers": your current view | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 08-29-2012 09:48 PM |
WTB/T: T206 wet transfers | atx840 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-06-2011 10:49 AM |
Informal Hall of Fame Opinion Poll | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 109 | 07-15-2010 03:09 PM |