Does this "newer" card have interest for 'vintage' collectors

[vintagetoppsguy]

I was hoping this auction would fly under the radar and I could win it for a decent price. Thanks a lot

Like others, I have absolutely no interest in this junk.

[obcbobd]

No interest.

Besides, I feel bidding on an item would just encourage the card companies to destroy more historical artifacts.

[geor952]

I like the looks of them and really don't have a problem with them, but I won't pay more than $10 for a relic card due to the concern over their authenticity. I would love to own that card, for $10.

I really don't understand why a "blue foil" parallel, or one numbered /10 is worth so much more for the same photo, auto, or relic made from a diff. color cardboard. That seems incredibly stupid to me. Just my opinion, never been into collecting "the rainbow," like a lot of modern collectors.

[drc]

I don't like game used and cut signature cards, but have nothing against many newer cards. I've bought Topps Chrome packs from the local drug store and liked the product. I thought some of the Topps Archive cards were well done too. Some of the non-cut autograph cards can be nice too.

Yes, in particular I dislike old jerseys, bats and documents being cut up. Though jersey swatches of any kind and player/era don't do it for me. A little piece of cloth doesn't excite my senses.

Also, I want Ty Cobb on a 1913 card not a 2013 card. Felix Hernandez on a 2013 is fine.

That's just my taste.