![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll go:
Baseball: Ruth (Grove for pitchers) Basketball: Jordan (curious where James ends up) Football: Unitas/Montana (hard to compare positions in football, but QBs are more valuable than RBs/WRs. (Brady and Manning could eclipse these guys) Hockey: Gretzky (who along with Orr,Howe, and Lemieux probably make up everyone's top 4) It baffles me that some people are leaving off Gretzky in Hockey. Of all the sports, Gretzky's numbers are by far the most dominant. I'm OK with saying "Orr is the greatest defenceman" or "Orr redefined the role of defenceman" or "Orr embodies everything great about hockey" or "I wish my daughter would marry Bobby Orr", but to say Orr is better "by a wide margin" over Gretzky is silly. At least keep the forwards, defenceman, and goalies separate. To claim Lemieux is better due to goal rates is also a bit absurd. Goal rates are skewed towards shorter careers. The fact that Gretzky had a long and productive career with a normal decline phase shouldn't be held against him when comparing to guys like Orr, Bossy, or Lemieux. Also ignoring assists for Gretzky is like ignoring wins for Cy Young or strikeouts for Nolan Ryan. Gretzky had more assists than any other player has had points. Add in the fact that Gretzky has the most goals ever and he has 50% more points than #2 on the list! Lemieux was never going to come close to that even if the game hadn't slowed down after '94. While hockey stats are difficult to adjust for teams and era, I have never seen any analysis that puts Howe and Lemieux ahead over their careers (they do close the gap and Lemieux had a comparable, but shorter peak). Also, saying that Gretzky benefited from playing with great players like Kurri is misleading. Lemieux benefited from playing with Kevin Stevens because any competent linemate is going to benefit you. It is more fair to say Kurri and Stevens benefited from playing with Gretzky and Lemieux. Messier, Coffey, and Gretzky are all great players, but again why penalize Gretzky for capturing the cup with those guys? Of Howe, Gretzky, Lemieux, and Orr, none won the cup in the second half of their careers. Howe and Orr had great teams that couldn't overcome greater Habs teams. Lemieux didn't win until he had some other HOFers surrounding him (Francis, Jagr, Murphy, Coffey, Recchi, Mullen). Although most were not at their peaks, this wasn't a "bunch of wannabees" inspired by Lemieux. Gretzky did carry the '93 Kings to the cup, but lost (as all the greats seem to) to Montreal. Strange that Montreal ended Howe's run in the 50s, Orr's run in the '70s, blocked Gretzky's last cup, and won it immediately after Lemieux's cups. I totally understand if Howe, Orr, or Lemieux is your favorite hockey player, or if you want to include them in the best ever discussion; but, like Ruth in baseball, Gretzky is the man to beat. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Large lot of 80's-2000's Baseball, Basketball, Football and Hockey SOLD | aquarius31 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 06-12-2012 03:46 PM |
1960s Basketball, Football and Hockey Photos FS | Exhibitman | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-20-2012 11:51 AM |
FS: Old Basketball Football Hockey | Andy Sandler | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 06-29-2011 10:49 PM |
I find it hard to buy Basketball and Hockey card when it's Baseball season. | k-dog | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 7 | 08-26-2010 05:00 PM |
1950's-90's Signed Cards - Baseball, Football, Basketball, Hockey - HOF + | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 03-18-2009 02:49 PM |