![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Jantz, hope all is well.
These cards as you know we're stacked 2+ per player and each had their own back plate up/down the column. A scratch on the lower Durham should be different then a scratch on the top one. Every sheet printed with Durham using the damaged plate should show the same scratches in the same spot. Until they ran a second print with a repaired plate. If we can catalogue each unique front per identifiable back plate we can know those players were located in the same spot on the sheet. This indicates a unique sheet layout with that player in that location and could give us potential # of sheets used to run the series. If there were 5 players with the same scratch then its plausible 5 sheets were used to print the 150 cards. 150/5 would indicate 30 unique cards per sheet. Fun stuff.
__________________
T206 gallery |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Piedmont 150 plate scratch(es) progress | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 339 | 04-15-2022 12:27 PM |
N172 progress | uffda51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 12-08-2012 05:34 AM |
My T205 progress | zljones | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 12-09-2011 02:06 PM |
Buy/Sell/Trade Progress | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-17-2005 08:34 AM |
Ebay making progress | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-05-2003 08:16 PM |