 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
02-08-2013, 07:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Okay, I get it.
One other thing. I have a thing about (against) "baggies." Don't bid on or buy any card, with very rare exceptions, that is in any kind of covering (except the slab plastic). I hate the Silks in bags so I asked SGC to do mine without it and they agreed. Yes, it only got an "A" but it looks fantastic--shiny even--in the slab without the baggy. Also I just switched a very nice NM card of another type out of a PSA holder only for that "baggy" reason and happily got a 7.5 from SGC but that's just a bonus because it looks 100% without the bag. I guess we all have our hangups. Don't get me started on centering. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question re: S21 vs. S22 tobacco silks | BradH | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-09-2011 09:47 AM |
| Question about buying graded | mjmj1966 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 09-07-2011 11:18 PM |
| fs/th S74 silks chance and Parent SGC graded | Republicaninmass | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 04-02-2011 06:22 PM |
| Graded Review Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-09-2009 09:23 AM |
| Question about Graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-26-2001 11:07 AM |
Threaded Mode