 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
01-31-2013, 10:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Tim,
if print timing is your polestar I don't see how it supports your print group breakdown. Yes you can say that the 150-onlys and 150/350s were both printed between July 1909 and February 1910 so what difference does it make but my response would be that the 150-onlys were printed from July 1909 to November 1909 whereas the 150/350s were printed between July 1909 and February 1910 so it makes all the difference in the world. (Dates are approximate). The same logic applies for the SLers--while there is overlap in print timing there is not identity. Thanks for the discussion. Need to sign off. Scot 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: t206 groups, HOF w/ tostois too | trobba | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-23-2012 01:06 PM |
| Looking for Groups of PSA T206's | longstreet766 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2009 08:38 PM |
| Topps Baseball Stamps - An Overview | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 09-06-2008 10:59 AM |
| WTB Raw T206/T205 Lots/Groups | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-06-2007 07:51 AM |
| Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |
Threaded Mode