|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
No thanks I would assume you would have the "nuts" to simply clear here publicly since you made the comment.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
John- that's what I figured.....
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
can we please get back on topic and mock the PSA boards and its migrating members?
__________________
OBC (oldbaseball.com) member since 1996... looking for a low-budget T205 Irvin Wilhelm w/ "suffered" Scans of my Brooklyn Dodger collection |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
What are you the riddler? Figured what you made a comment I said please clarify...
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why dont you grow a set? 229-630-1686....
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kevin it’s not about fear it’s about not wasting too much of my time jawing with you over nothing. I barely see the need to talk to you in this thread much longer let alone call you. I’m sure your lonely, I get it but perhaps e-harmony or something is a better option for you? You can always “bump” your profile should you not get any responses right away.
Kevin, I won’t take any more of your time. Besides I’m sure you have countless BST threads to bump on insanely undergraded low pop cards. Along with a night filled with outing other members cards that you feel are trimmed or overgraded. Keep up the good fight. Hugs & Kisses John |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Use your giant manhood and publicly clarify your comment…or should I say “what I figured”?
![]() Again why do I have to call you? Are we pals now? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike- I was wondering when you would chime in! Boy I've missed you!
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi guys. I am not taking sides, or anything like that, but I was actually hoping for some honest opinions on this one card in particular, because I found the grade to be seriously absurd. I saw it the the other day and was actually hoping for some feedback from the pros on this one.
Mr. Mize, I know you have a seriously fine eye for corners and high grade pieces in general, but wouldnt a stain of this magnitude be grounds for a serious docking of the grade? I am just curious as to everyones opinion on a piece like this, and I figured this would be a good thread to ask. I feel like I am not grasping the staining aspect of a card when it is being graded. Thank You. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lol.
Mr. Luckey, I would actually be very curious as to your opinion on this one in particular. Personally, I do not care about grades too much, and I do not know if you do, but what do you make of this? I have seen a card get docked heavily for a small amount of paper loss on the back, and I would like to use this one particular example if I may: http://goodwinandco.com/LotDetail.aspx?lotid=8289 The only real flaw on this Waddell that I can see is a small amount of paper loss on the back. I truly find the fact these cards (the Bresnahan I posted above and the Waddell) are considered "equals" in terms of condition to be nothing short of offensive. Maybe I am wrong here, but I just do not get it. I would truly appreciate your opinion on this subject, as these are just a few examples. Thank You Mr. Luckey, and to anyone else who would like to give their opinion. Derek Last edited by DerekMichael; 01-31-2013 at 08:37 PM. Reason: for my crappy grammar |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Technically I think the Hindu is overgraded by 2 grades. Might have brought as much in a 2 holder bc of the lack of severity of the damage??
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you Jeff. May I ask, if you feel the Waddell is over graded by 2 whole points, then how many points was the Bresnahan over graded?
In my honest opinion, the eye appeal and preservation of the Waddell card just destroys the Bresnahan beyond any words I can even communicate. There is just no comparison in my eyes as to which piece is by far superior. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() It was probably swapped out
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you are allowed one coffee stain per submission.
Sure looks overgraded to me.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New to Boards and T206's | MBMiller25 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-18-2010 07:03 PM |
| Multiple Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-28-2005 10:33 AM |
| Any other boards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-04-2003 11:43 AM |
| SGC's New Message Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-14-2002 09:48 AM |
| 2 Boards ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-14-2001 06:36 PM |