![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
OK, I understand what you're saying and we will have to agree to disagree. I do not think that any of the southern league subjects were extended into the print group 2 (350 Only) production. I believe based on everything I have seen that the 48 southern league subjects were printed during the production of print group 1 (150/350) as one supplemental group. I believe all 48 were discontinued prior to print group 2 (350 Only) beginning.
The variances in numbers of some subjects with a given back does not imply to me that they were printed at different times. As I stated before, we see this in other print groups with certain backs. Last edited by Abravefan11; 01-28-2013 at 09:07 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim,
At least we have clarity as to the reasons for our disagreement. That is progress. ![]() Scot Last edited by sreader3; 01-28-2013 at 09:23 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scot - Anything positive is good.
So let's look at it this way. Brown (Washington), Dahlen (Brooklyn) and Elberfeld (Washington) are only possible with 350 backs. But a close look at the confirmed backs of these subjects show they are not part of print group 2 (350 Only) but continuations of their print group 1 subject. A team change was made during the production of print group 1 and combing the backs of the two variations shows this to be true. Last edited by Abravefan11; 01-28-2013 at 09:31 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Except the 14 southern leaguers not printed with Hindu were not team variation cards. They were new subjects.
Last edited by sreader3; 01-28-2013 at 10:03 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No they were not new team variatiosn and forgive me for further confusioning the issue.
They were part of the 48 subject group at the time of the Hindu printing, they just weren't printed at that time. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tim and Scot,
It is great to be a fly on the wall of this conversation. Thank you for all your hard work in trying to make sense of this set(s). JimB |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: t206 groups, HOF w/ tostois too | trobba | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-23-2012 01:06 PM |
Looking for Groups of PSA T206's | longstreet766 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2009 08:38 PM |
Topps Baseball Stamps - An Overview | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 09-06-2008 10:59 AM |
WTB Raw T206/T205 Lots/Groups | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-06-2007 07:51 AM |
Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |