![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice thread Tim. While I am not a specific T206 Collector I have been going through 500 or so T206s the last few days. I have seen quite a few Southern Leaguers. I have a couple questions, and the first one might be stupid.
1. Is the Southern Association the same thing as the Southern League? (I know, stupid question) 2. How scarce are the SL'ers in relation to other players? I think in this 500'ish grouping there is an inordinately high percentage. I don't know what that is right now but it seems like there are quite a few. Any thoughts? And btw, most of the grouping is Piedmont (around 300), Old Mill (around 120), Hindu (around 20), Red Hindu (1) Sweep Caporal (around 20), EPDG 3-4......as well as there are around 50 T210s (almost all from series 3 but some from 2) and about 30-40 T205s......I think all with Piedmont backs. These were found in Irving TX....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 01-28-2013 at 03:26 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() great thread. i have it bookmarked. i'm sure there will be tons of other good info added as well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great post, Tim! can you attach some dates to the various print groups?
Leon, i am sure Tim will jump in here, but SLers are definitely rarer then commons and even most HOFers. they were simply printed over a much shorter period of time, and available only regionally (the south). i am sure the high number of SLers in your group is due to where they were found (Texas). |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Leon-
The southern league subjects were from four leagues. Southern Association Virginia League South Atlantic League Texas League And Mike answered your second question in the post above. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Definitive dates of when one group stopped and another began aren't known. Below is a general timeline based on what we do know, but it's by no means meant to be exact.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim - Great post, thanks.
Leon - Keep me in mind if you have T206 Southern Leaguers for sale, especially Hindu backs! ![]()
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These will all be offered in the next auction. lots of SL's and many of them are Hindu backs, Stay tuned for details.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice summary Tim. This helped answer some of my questions after my first time through Inside T206
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim, that chart really paints a clear picture, awesome, thanks!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim,
As I have written elsewhere, I would split the southern leaguers into two print groups: the 34 that are available with Hindu (150/350) and the 14 that are not (350-only). As Jamie Hull discovered, 34 southern league subjects have essentially equivalent back distribution split between Hindu, Piedmont 350 and Old Mill Southern and the other 14 have essentially equivalent back distribution split between only Piedmont 350 and Old Mill Southern. (Footnote: I miss Jamie Hull--he was a truly great T206 researcher). Scot Last edited by sreader3; 01-28-2013 at 06:55 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great input...I love the summation Tim!!
![]() I have always wondered about the super prints with sov 460 backs since i'm attempting the sub- set...the general "rarity" is disputed amongst collectors, but I have trouble finding these super prints...I know there are other sov 460 combos just as tuf, but the superprints in this paticuliar sub set seem to get alot of attention in regard to the apparent rarity...any thoughts on this?? the rarity of the super-prints in sov 460??? ![]() Scot!!- Where has Jamie BEEN??!!! ![]() ![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This is not true. The 34 southern subjects that come with Hindu are much tougher than any Piedmont or Old Mill subject, the same 34 or the other 14. My belief is the reason it is 34 is that is the number of subjects that compose a sheet. There are 102 major league subjects printed with Hindu and to put 14 subjects in their own group you would have to put the 102 in their own group. That is not the case. For some unknown reason they stopped printing Hindu. That is clear by the ads. Dooin and Waddell and Nicholls are pictured on ads and do not exist with Hindu.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very cool thread
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice thread Tim!
Can someone please give me the small list of players that can be found only with 150 Series backs in the (Group 1) printing? Thanks |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
0 T206Timeline.jpg
I think we can move print group 1 back a month or two if the information in this newspaper clip I found about the court proceedings is accurate. Baseball pictures put in packs The_News_and_Observer_Thu__Jun_22__1911_.jpg |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The Harry McIntyre BKN/CHI card in Group 2 could not have been printed until at least April 1910 since his trade to the Cubs occurred on April 13. Of course knowing N54 collectors, I suspect one of you will flash me a BKN-only version to prove me wrong.
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jason, Harry McIntyre (BKN/CHI) is print group 3.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Indeed! Brain fart on my part. ![]() Jason Twitter: @heavyj28
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have seen quite a few Southern Leaguers. I have a couple questions, and the first one might be stupid.
1. Is the Southern Association the same thing as the Southern League? (I know, stupid question) Leon - Definitely not a stupid question-actually a very good question. The answer is yes and no. I think the reverse of the Old Mill T206 SL card is the reason for the confusion. It cleary states on the reverse of any of the T206 SLer card "Baseball Series Selection from Texas, South Atlantic, Virginia, and Southern Leagues." The Southern League started in 1885 and ended around 1900, and the Southern Association was officially formed around 1900. Essentially many of the same Southern cities/teams were represented in both leagues, and this is where the confusion comes in.... Although they are referred to as Southern Leaguer's (1909-11 time frame), they are technically Southern Association players/teams. Due to verbiage on the reverse of the OM card, and the ease of the words Southern Leaguer as opposed to Southern Association player, we collector's call them Southern Leaguer's, but technically they are Southern Associationer's ! (See 1908 Southern Association Champions PC which includes Harry Bay, Bill Bernhard, and Hub Perdue, 3 of the "SLer's" from the T206 OM group) - So, technically they are not SLer's, but this is what the collecting universe calls them.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia Last edited by DixieBaseball; 01-29-2013 at 06:54 AM. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks Jeremy. I have seen the 2 names used almost interchangeably and that is why I asked. It was a question that sounded like I should have known though ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 01-29-2013 at 07:03 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: t206 groups, HOF w/ tostois too | trobba | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-23-2012 01:06 PM |
Looking for Groups of PSA T206's | longstreet766 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2009 08:38 PM |
Topps Baseball Stamps - An Overview | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 09-06-2008 10:59 AM |
WTB Raw T206/T205 Lots/Groups | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-06-2007 07:51 AM |
Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |