![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you put one hundred ruth balls of all types, 50 good and 50 bad, and people couldnt see the certs, they wouldnt get them all right but maybe they would get most of them.
but put all the good ones with cc certs, and all the bad ones with psa, jsa certs, and nary one would be "guessed" right, because giving out the cert information ahead of time taints and biases the opiner. people wont admit psa or jsa is wrong and someone else may be right. i am no expert at ruth so i dont know about this one or most, but thats the point, most others dont either, they take the easy way out of calling all psa and jsa good and all "dubious" certs bad. i showed a garo certed item that was good once and people couldnt believe it. but show a bad psa or jsa and they get mad because how can psa or jsa ever be wrong? that is exactly why jsa failed previously jsa item when it got a certain cert from someone they didnt like. same thing here. if it has a cert they dont like, its automatically bad. and automatically good if it comes from the gods of psa or jsa. how else could you account for the snow white balls that sell for 300,000 dollars that are slowly drawn and ridiculous but have a psa cert? put that same ball in a cc auction and watch these same guys call it a big, fat lemon. in other words, everyone is an expert after they know where the cert is from, but not before. i never see an opinion from some regarding the old autographs before the cert is revealed or before there is a consensus among several other people first. Last edited by travrosty; 01-21-2013 at 08:42 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How can you never see an opinion before there's a "consensus," Travis? Someone has to go first.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only thing more unnecessary than another Travis rehash rant? His godawful habit of double posting.
Here's a suggestion. How about picking your favorite rant, using that as your signature, and start posting like a normal human being? Disclosure: I own ZERO graded items.
__________________
"If you ever discover the sneakers for far more shoes in your everyday individual, and also have a wool, will not disregard the going connected with sneakers by Isabel Marant a person." =AcellaGet |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every post is like Groundhog Day.
![]()
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That Ruth ball isn't a CC item. Theirs are usually snow white and can be read from 64 meters away
![]() It does get tiring. as it seems every , or most threads, regarding opinions require Travis to bring up JSA or PSA. Someone here had a good idea. Show the item w NO mention of ANY cert from anyone, and see what folks say. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
My Hall of Fame autograph collection http://s236.photobucket.com/albums/f...NFT/?start=all |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ruth Gehrig ball opinion | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 04-14-2012 10:31 PM |
Ruth Sig...opinion | jboosted92 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 02-21-2012 06:53 AM |
Could I get an opinion on this 67 Brooks Robinson | George Baseball | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 07-16-2011 07:57 PM |
Babe Ruth cut signature, need your opinion? | kenjrrice | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 09-22-2009 01:39 PM |
Ruth card opinion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-07-2005 12:07 PM |