New Member Saying Hello: Banned From PSA Forums This Morning

[teetwoohsix]

Originally Posted by DavidG1966

Hi Clayton. No correlation at all... No jealousy at the 10's at ALL. I am VERY happy with my 9's!!!! None of what you saw in my collection was self submitted. I could not even imagine having to pay for 10's.

I am glad you like the tunes!!!!

Edit: Well, there is one 10 hidden in my collection. So I guess I don't have to imagine having to pay for a 10. I did pay for one.

OK I admit it, I'm confused. Why did you get banned? All I see is an introduction with a long list.

Sincerely, Clayton

P.S. Liked the music, video, and collection !!! Nice job.

[DavidG1966]

Originally Posted by teetwoohsix

OK I admit it, I'm confused. Why did you get banned? All I see is an introduction with a long list.

Sincerely, Clayton

P.S. Liked the music, video, and collection !!! Nice job.

Exactly! (LOL). Its just ONE very long sequential submission that got many people on the other site upset. I didn't even START the thread on the certs. It also had a spin-off thread poofed and another thread selectively edited by the moderator. I believe there is one thread over there right now with someone asking ME about the list. Unfortunately, do to circumstances not under my control I am unable to reply to him!

I just got banned from one site. I don't want to get banned from this one for giving any opinions. I am out of the opinion giving business. "Just the facts, Sir" and that list is ALL the facts that I have.

Again... thanks for watching my video!!!!!!!

[HRBAKER]

Welcome David. You'll like it here.

Someone obviously has a great eye for knowing what PSA looks for in a GEM MINT 10. I can't imagine why they would have a problem with you pointing out the skills of one of their submitters!

[DavidG1966]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

Welcome David. You'll like it here.

Someone obviously has a great eye for knowing what PSA looks for in a GEM MINT 10. I can't imagine why they would have a problem with you pointing out the skills of one of their submitters!

Go Figure!

[Peter_Spaeth]

What were folks saying over on CU before the moderator stepped in?

[Tobacco&Gum]

David, maybe it was all that Kirby Puckett bashing that got you banned!

Seriously, I read that thread, and I can't imagine why someone would be tossed over it. Do you know if the OP was banned?

[DavidG1966]

Originally Posted by Tobacco&Gum

David, maybe it was all that Kirby Puckett bashing that got you banned!

Seriously, I read that thread, and I can't imagine why someone would be tossed over it. Do you know if the OP was banned?

If I got banned I do not know HOW the OP could not have been! And other people too! I just posted the list, some funny pictures and possibly added a little accelerant. The moderator actually emailed me and gave me the name of the submitter and lectured me on how much business they do with them. I guess they don't consider the names of submitters or information like that private.

AND... Mattingly was WAY more deserving of being a HOFer then Puckett! Hahahahahaha!! Don't make me post that Sports Illustrated Cover here! (LOL)

[Edwolf1963]

Originally Posted by DavidG1966

..and lectured me on how much business they do with them.

I'm still missing something here, I'm not on their board - was the issue questioning all the 10's PSA gave - and to one vendor in particular (4 Sharp Corners or whomever)? Being "lectured" on "how much business they do with them" .. Wow - well, hasn't that been a long-standing perception/issue with PSA for ages? It would seem that (correlating the amount of business given to grades), along with tossing people off their board who would dare question, would only serve to galvanize opinions and accusations

[doug.goodman]

Welcome to Net54 David.

As a raw cards guy, I'm not exactly sure what that list is, or what it means. I see that the numbers are sequential, does that mean that you submitted all of those cards to the people who get paid for their opinions, and those are the results you got?

Doug

[Peter_Spaeth]

Was it 4 Sharp Corners?

[smtjoy]

As a submitter to both PSA and SGC for many years, when I first saw the list I was thinking April Fools Day joke, got to be. I have submitted many cards from those years and I am lucky to get ONE 10 every 5-10 cards, just seems impossible and possibly something very wrong. That fact they deleted the threads quickly and started banning makes it worse, cover-up anyone??? Sorry someone getting a sub with 90% 10's and they are all tough very valuable cards from the 1960-70's (we are not talking modern shiny stuff, even then I dont think you could hit that percent of 10's) is total BS.

Then I think of the whole Dmitri Young comment of them looking at his card and then giving it the bump to 10.

On to the whole Art Shell cards bumping at National and all this combined leaves me thinking something is seriously wrong.


How long before this sub pops up for auction with an ebay consignment house..........

[EvilKing00]

rofl - um what were they upset about - i dont get it either.

[insidethewrapper]

I don't understand this post or thread at all.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by insidethewrapper

I don't understand this post or thread at all.

The original poster posted that list, from a very good PSA customers submission, on the PSA board. I guess they were discussing how all of those 10s could happen. PSA didn't like the way the thread was going, for whatever reason, and took the thread down and banned the original poster of our thread. I didn't realize what the list was about at first but then caught on (I am sort of slow) after a while. Hope that helps explain it.

[oldjudge]

To paraphrase a popular commercial, if you or I submitted a group of cards our odds of getting this percent 10s would be the same as being mauled by a polar bear and a brown bear in the same day (and also winning the lottery that day).

[calvindog]

PSA and its representatives are a little more straightforward when testifying before a grand jury.