13-2 Team with only 3 Pro bowlers? 2-13 Team with 5 Pro bowlers?

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by HRBAKER

David,
That all sounds logical but have you watched the Chiefs?
Not 5 PBlers there.

+1....The Chiefs having 5 Pro bowlers might be the biggest joke in the history of all Pro Bowls. I think this year there were 8 or 9 teams who did not have a single one. What kind of sense does that make?

[Jlighter]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

+1....The Chiefs having 5 Pro bowlers might be the biggest joke in the history of all Pro Bowls.

Except for the actual pro bowl itself.

[HRBAKER]

Originally Posted by Jlighter

Except for the actual pro bowl itself.

I'll agree with this. With the exception of the The Real Housewives of Anywhere, the Pro Bowl may be about about the biggest waste of airtime ever.

[jefferyepayne]

This is what happens when the fans are allowed to vote. Is football a sport or entertainment? If it's all about entertainment, then the fans should rule. If it's about actual performance, having fans vote is a farce.

jeff

[CMIZ5290]

Jeff- totally agree with you....

[chris6net]

I am not sure but I believe the Giants (Super Bowl Champs) had only 3 pro-bowlers last year. For a fan of a team that has never won anything I would worry about at least winning a playoff game than the silly pro-bowl voting. The Falcons have had a great year and deserve a lot of praise but SD was 14-2 a few years ago and lost in the playoffs and never recovered and KC was the same a decade ago and never recovered. Atlanta seems to me like a paper Tiger so lets see them get to at least the Super Bowl to validate their season. They were dogs last year against a 9-7 team in the first round as the game was non competitive.

[bigred1]

You mean some people actually watch it. An exhibition game at best. The only players who care, it seems, are the ones who have bonuses in their contract. I usually bet the over. lol