![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So...I don't know what they are. I would guess some sort of alignment thing.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The bottom ones say 30(like the Durham), as in the factory I assume. The two loops are the top of the 3, top of the 0. I've seen one with a much bigger portion of the number where it is easier to tell
__________________
Please check out my books. Bio of Dots Miller https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CV633PNT 13 short stories of players who were with the Pirates during the regular season, but never appeared in a game for them https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CY574YNS The follow up to that book looks at 20 Pirates players who played one career game. https://www.amazon.com/Moment-Sun-On.../dp/B0DHKJHXQJ The worst team in Pirates franchise history https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C6W3HKL8 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay, I'm with you. Thanks, and here's an example to go along with your explanation:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-30-2014 at 12:04 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is that the Mathewson portrait? I believe someone here has/had that card with the sheet number
__________________
Please check out my books. Bio of Dots Miller https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CV633PNT 13 short stories of players who were with the Pirates during the regular season, but never appeared in a game for them https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CY574YNS The follow up to that book looks at 20 Pirates players who played one career game. https://www.amazon.com/Moment-Sun-On.../dp/B0DHKJHXQJ The worst team in Pirates franchise history https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C6W3HKL8 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's the Factory #......I have seen other such numbers and they always coincide with the Factory # of the given T-brand.
These #'s most likely identify to the printer (at a quick glance) which specific back printing plate they have selected for a given press run. Recall, that the fronts have been pre-printed and the various T-brand backs are printed last. TED Z |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have seen a factory 25 designation on the the bottom as well and a few with the side mark, which looks more like an alignment marking vs #.
__________________
T206 gallery |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm not sure I understand your...."vs #" ? Perhaps, I should clarify my previous comment........ "It's the Factory #......I have seen other such numbers and they always coincide with the Factory # of the given T-brand. These #'s most likely identify to the printer (at a quick glance) which specific back printing plate they have selected for a given press run." Yes I have seen the #25, also; and, the card it was printed on was a Sweet Cap, Factory #25. Has anyone seen a T206 with any other # which does NOT coincide with the Factory # on that particular card ? I don't think so. The lettering on the actual printer's plate(s) of these various Factory's found on American Beauty, Piedmont, and Sweet Cap backs is very tiny; therefore, each plate identified the given Factory # on the printed sheet with these large numbers along the edge of the sheet. Which made it easier for jobber at American Lithographic to cut, package, and ship the cards to the appropriate Tobacco Factory. TED Z |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds like he agreed with you/me/Scott, Ted. Then he gave his thought what the side mark meant.
__________________
Please check out my books. Bio of Dots Miller https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CV633PNT 13 short stories of players who were with the Pirates during the regular season, but never appeared in a game for them https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CY574YNS The follow up to that book looks at 20 Pirates players who played one career game. https://www.amazon.com/Moment-Sun-On.../dp/B0DHKJHXQJ The worst team in Pirates franchise history https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C6W3HKL8 Last edited by z28jd; 11-20-2012 at 01:43 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Ted, I agree 100% with your posts, it was more to Jantz regarding Scott's comment that the side mark does not appear to be a # but more of marking.
I have not seen a # on anything but SC and no 42 or 649s (not sure if would even exist). I have seen these factory #s on different examples of the same card.
__________________
T206 gallery |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always thought this was a strange print mark - the 'J' above the 'T' in Piedmont. It's the same color ink as the rest of the back. I've posted it once before on Net54 and have never seen another like it. Figured I'd share again.
![]()
__________________
T206 518/518 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 McCormick, wet sheet transfer | 69orioles | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-26-2012 03:16 PM |
FS: T206 color variation, wet sheet transfer | drumback | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 08-04-2012 05:33 PM |
Genuine T206 Uncut Sheet | ruth-gehrig | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-18-2011 08:49 AM |
T206 sheet groupings | t206hound | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-11-2010 10:30 AM |
A possible T206 sheet? | Jantz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 05-19-2010 09:07 AM |