![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In their defense, in my case, there was almost no way they could have known. I do agree though, if it's a no-brainer and they made a gross mistake, I would expect a refund if I asked.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First ya'll get the FBI to slap our wrists when we shill bid...
....now you want honesty in advertising our lots??? unbelievable! I guess we'll just have to jack the buyers penalty up to 33% and charge 5x the going rate for shipping. (shakes fist at damn collectors) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tough one, if all they did was check the population reports it would look like it's the only one. I have a common like that, SGC 80 shown as the best of its kind, but there's an 88 out there. (Which actually looks worse than mine
![]() While I think that would be forgivable on a cheap card- like maybe something around $20-100- I would like to think they'd spend a bit of time getting it right on a card that will sell for a few thousand. I'm sure the interns they can hire cheap could find the prior sales very quickly. Ultimately the auction house would keep their own database to make that process quicker. Obviously that's all just wishful thinking. Steve B |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I imagine this has been covered many times but--what is the accepted version of WHEN PSA started keeping track for pop report of 1) all graded cards 2) breaking down t206 backs. Thanks.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They can lie all they want in the description, since I typically stop reading after chapter 3... They do however need to stop adjusting scan color and contrast. All I want is for the card that shows up to look like the catalog.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
screwing with the picture is more egregious then puffery in my opinion.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
JimB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
+1 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Goodwin currently has a series 4 T210 of Collier PSA 1.5 which is advertised as not only the lone graded copy but there are no known ungraded copies known to exist.
Interesting since I have an SGC 30 T210-4 Collier ![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Most auction house employ the "in the neighborhood" rule when it comes to descriptions.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
![]() |
|
|