![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which would you take if both were valued the same? | |||
I would pick A |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 18.13% |
I would pick B |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
131 | 81.88% |
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I picked B, but I'd really be happy with either one. OC doesn't bother me, paper loss and creases are more of an issue to me when buying a card.
Sincerely, Clayton |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I was only getting opinions. I could care less what others like for my personal preferences. I collect what I like not what others like. As far as you being confused. You said it not me.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm suffering.
JimB ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, since everyone's doing it....
![]() Centered a bit low, with a slight tilt, nice corners, 2 minor surface wrinkles, and low-grade affordability -- just how I like 'em. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB T206 Cobb Portait Green | BosseFieldBoy | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-22-2011 08:08 AM |
T206 Cobb Green Portrait SGC 30 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 10-05-2008 04:21 PM |
*Sold* T206 Sovereign Ty Cobb Green Portrait | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-05-2008 11:26 AM |
Sell me a Green t206 Cobb! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-23-2008 10:23 AM |
Looking for 206 Cobb green & Mathews portraits in 1-3 grade | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-17-2007 07:29 PM |