![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With such a delicate worldview it must be hard to throw anything away. Each creation being so unique and a part of historical record.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the card looks nice, bit I agree with David to a point. I think it would have been better to use a index card instead of this photo. Yes it's just a polariod but it is unique and I'm sure there's not many out there.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's an age-old argument as to whether the resulting piece is more or less desirable than the original components. To use an argument of aesthetics (the product looks better than the components) against an argument for the intrinsic value of truly unique items is an exercise in futility. If you place higher value on the aesthetics, you will be less concerned about the integrity of the original pieces. If you place a high value on keeping a piece of memorabilia in its original state, whether the finished product looks good or not, knowing what was destroyed to create it will taint your enjoyment of it.
The same conflicts crop up when discussing whether to have a vintage photograph signed by an aging former ballplayer, whether to use a vintage ball for a modern signing, whether/how to have an old stadium seat restored, what pieces to cut up and put in a card, and on and on and on. Bottom line is, if you're presenting your manufactured piece to a group of collectors for comment, you have to expect that there are going to be people from both camps in the crowd and that not all of their comments will be praises. If you ask for opinions, it's poor sport to attack those who speak up when they state opinions differing from yours. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's too bad someone ruined those one of a kind photos with Ruth and Gehrig autographs. Especially since they were signing everything and anything at the time.
__________________
Buying Kansas CDVs, Cabinets, RPPCs and other pre 1930 memorabilia. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They weren't? Have you ever heard of Ruth refusing to sign anything? (contracts excepted, of course.)
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ya know what? F#*k it. Go cut up whatever the hell you want, if it makes you happy.
(I'll go on protecting the stuff I own, though. It will all be passed on to the next generation, in the same shape I received it.) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R315's factory cut? | brob28 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-22-2011 11:14 PM |
Diamond Cut Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-18-2008 10:22 PM |
How does PSA grade hand cut cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 11-07-2007 02:59 PM |
Cut from a sheet -Is that ok? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 06-03-2007 02:03 PM |
Cut on the '33 Goudey cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-21-2002 09:00 AM |