![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks better than the Walsh...or at least the scan of the Walsh ;-)
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have to say- I had a thought about something like this being possible with the overprints of certain caramel cards (what's stopping someone from getting an Old Put or Toy Town stamp), as well as some of the ghost imagery we've seen on many T206 cards. Is any mechanism in place to ensure stamps (and ghost prints, etc) are genuine? I've seen cards with crazy printing freaks slabbed Authentic in the past- suppose someone buys a raw, REAL card, prints/stamps something less than authentic on it (ie- American Beauty logo, Toy Town, etc), and submits it for slabbing- the card, technically, is Authentic. Will it come back graded? Authentic? Not slabbed at all? Supposing a "fake" stamp on a real card ends up in an Auth slab- how can future buyers know it's not "real?"
I've always wanted an overprint caramel card but I have to say- this sort of thing makes me very nervous. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
There have been a few tries at faking the overprints but so far I don't think they have gotten by the TPGs, except for one fake E94 overprint which was quickly revealed (and now resides in my collection as I wanted it off the market). We do know most of the currently known types of overprints have been around since before they had any real value, so they aren't a newly made-up phenomenon. Knowledge is key...And most of these particular examples have 25+ yr provenance .... ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, but it's really easy to replicate those stamps. Heck, I did this on my computer with MS Paint in about 4 minutes. Imagine what I could do with better software, or a strong ink stamp!
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both of the fake ones posted look really fake to me. I realize that they were quick attempts and not really intended to fool but even those that try really hard have a hard road ahead. We, as a collecting community, look at these cards really closely, more so even than people with counterfeit money. We scan them, share them and look at them over and over.
If I put a loop up to either one of those posted, once they are printed out, I'm going to see a dot pattern. And if you make a stamp, you will notice that each stamp that you create is slightly different than what you intended, letter spacing slightly off, line separation, etc. So, I don't think it would be as easy as it seems. Our community also has a vested interest in protecting the integrity of our cards, just as the Treasury Department has an interest in protecting the value of currency. We ought to be very protective. Last edited by Jaybird; 10-09-2012 at 11:46 AM. Reason: grammar |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hell of a nice job Paul! Now you need to photo copy his signature, so you have a rare overprint signed Cobb T206!
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anything can be done with software, getting them past knowledgeable collectors is the tougher step.
![]() ![]() As for what can be done with a stamp we have seen that already. ![]() http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=112134 Last edited by wonkaticket; 10-09-2012 at 01:15 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A lot can be done with curent technology, but it always leaves a trace of what it is. Maybe not visible in a scan, but it's there.
The rubber stamped stuff is probably the easiest, but geting it exactly right would be difficult. The one that amazes me the most at how much recognition it gets is toy town. It's just the rubber stamp from a game that was available when the cards were current. A tiny toy post office complete with tiny letters and stamps and a toy town rubber stamp to cancel the stamps. It could get stamped on anything, and like most stuff for kids probably did. Steve B |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
John Is that Ty Cobb Back Ghost print for sale? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are no scans of Walsh. I took those with my phone after it was slabbed
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I chased this card for a year based on a back scan posted (front scan image link was broken) on another forum. User deleted all posts and left no details..after a lot of searching and three owners later I got in contact with the original owner of the card.
Coincidently he had earlier tried to sell me and other Net54ers a T206 Ames with a Cobb ghost on the back that looked suspicious. It was discussed on Net54 and determined to likely be a faked error. After a few calls the trail to the card ended. I was able to get a front scan from him and that he sold it to a collector for $2,500ish. I'm still not 100% convinced its legit but it looks very real.
__________________
T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 04-15-2013 at 02:47 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ghost Young, Orange Cobb, Cobb red port pulled from a pack:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It makes total sense that bogus printing freaks and fake "scrap" are the scammers' best friends right now. As recently as two years ago, a majority of collectors who now salivate over T206 oddities would have turned up their noses at them. But now, those oddities are the flavor of day/month/year, so everyone wants one, which means you have a lot of uneducated buyers who really don't know what they're buying.
When you add into the mix that most legitimate printing oddities are one-of-a-kind, it makes it easier for card doctors to turn out more "unique" examples to unload on the unsuspecting. Because of the high prices that printing freaks and their brethren bring, you have the perfect storm for fraud. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris was the Ames w/Cobb a Cobb red port. on the back? If so I almost did a trade at the Balt.2010 nationals. It was slabbed as an A by SGC. I was concerened with the Cobb port. having a dot matrix and took it over to SGC and was told that it was an A because the Cobb was not an authentic ghost and this made the card altered. My $5.99 loupe has saved me a lot of $, but learning how to identify these issues came from a lot of reading the board.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. This is the best reason to keep one's cards raw and do stupid things with them.
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
iv been fooled on a few brown oms, these scans are tuf....
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S: My T206 Collection HOFers and Rare Backs Included | wilsonic89 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 06-17-2010 10:27 AM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
T206 for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-23-2007 07:21 PM |
My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 11:43 AM |
*For Sale* SGC graded - T200, T205, T206, T210 and others | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-04-2006 06:25 AM |