![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Crude comparison, but the print is spot on when overlaid.
![]() ![]()
__________________
T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 10-03-2012 at 09:18 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok then...how much for this beauty? Bidding starts at 30k!!
After seeing Ted's old reprint I am at least having a bit of a pause with that new Blue Old Mill in the holder.....and I have been a believer in it being real.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The blue Walsh seems to line up better with the black Old Mill than the reprint that Ted has.
JimB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe I'm not seeing what you're seeing. The real OM and the blue Walsh OM aren't lined up in the photo posted. The real OM is larger and the tops and bottoms of the cards are not at equal points. The back printing is lined up, but the tops and bottoms of the cards are not.
Edited to add the top borders of the real card and reprint are aligned in Ted's photo, but not the Walsh photo. Last edited by packs; 10-03-2012 at 02:50 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
things that make you go huuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnn
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Walsh and the Real OM posted in the side by side photo are clearly different sizes, at least from the perspective of that photo.
Last edited by packs; 10-03-2012 at 04:38 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|