![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: The card is | |||
real and good. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 11.20% |
not real. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 | 38.40% |
Real but altered. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 10.40% |
I can't tell. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
50 | 40.00% |
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The first poll choice should be "real and spectacular" instead of "real and good."
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sellers other auctions all have exactly the same description and all are graded Mint 9 by AGS.
They are a 68 Topps Ryan rookie, a 67 Topps Mantle and a 68 Topps Mantle. Does this change anyone's mind? All good or all bad ![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think on the real ones, there's a pronounced difference in the color of the orange/red background and the area where "big league chewing gum" is printed. On the card in question, it doesn't look like there's much difference in those 2 colors.
I would stay away, but it's amazing how many people wish for something to be real. My father in law does it all the time. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Without the description or the holder, I would have voted that it was probably authentic. I have no reason to doubt the seller, though, since I'm only looking at scans.
If the fakes are getting that good, that's pretty scary. It'd be interesting to see the card stock on it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Coaches Corner sells AGS grades cards:
http://www.myccsa.com/lot/223/1933-g...aded-ex-5.aspx 'nuff said. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I disagree on the bleed-thru. Don't confuse the white scanner space on the left as part of the left border. Left border is thin--right border wider. When viewing the reverse it is the opposite, as it should be!
Having said that, all 4 cards are counterfeits.
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, I know. And it doesn't line up correctly.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look at the Feed Back history. This person has sold PSA graded cards in the past so why not get these cards graded by PSA if they are authentic?
Also, the seller received a Negative back in 2009 for a PSA graded Clemente rookie. The buyer said the card was a fake put into a real PSA holder. David |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I dont think it looks real to me. I believe it is 100% A FAKE.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At over 1k I hope it was real!! The winning bidder having private feedback doesn't inspire a lot of confidence....but it looks like there were other legit bidders bidding quite high.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looks like Lew Lipset's April Auction Has Some Goodies | White Borders | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-06-2011 07:24 PM |
MEARS January 2011 Auction updates | MEARSAUCTIONS | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-29-2011 03:09 PM |
MEARS January 2011 Auction updates | MEARSAUCTIONS | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 01-29-2011 03:06 PM |
Poll on Auction Closings | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 05-02-2010 02:00 AM |
Auction House Clarification | scgaynor | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-02-2010 11:22 PM |