 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-19-2012, 10:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Well its a total of 58 with a break out of 37 New Players plus 21 players from the 1925 set that had the box removed (Two of these had name misspellings corrected too).
37 New Players in 1926 John M. Bentley George Bischoff J. Fred Blake Ted Blankenship Lucerne A. Blue Geo. H. Burns John Butler Patrick T. Collins Earl B. Combs James E. Cooney Edward S. Farrell Bernard Friberg Joseph Galloway Charles Gehringer Fred Haney Wm. Hargrave Joseph Hauser C. E. Heathcote Ramon Herrera Andrew A. High Clarence Huber Wm. Hunnefield Anthony Lazzeri Frederick Lindstrom Hugh A. McQuillan Douglas McWeeny Oscar Melillo Joseph W. Munson Bernie F. Neis Robert O'Farrell James J. Ring Fred Spurgeon Edward Taylor J. Taylor John Warner Fred Wingfield Russell Wrightstone 21 players from both sets with No Box on 1926 David Bancroft Lawrence Benton Maurice Burrus Wilson Fewster Frank Frisch Jacques F. Furnier Joseph Genewich Burleigh A. Grimes George Harper Walter Henline John Makan Walter Marranville Emil Musel George O'Neil Walter C. Pipp Emory Rigney John Sand Frank Snyder Wm. Wambsganns Zach Wheat William Terry 
|
|
#3
09-20-2012, 06:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can't go by scans; gotta have them in hand and side by side. Scanning just has too many variables.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not...
|
|
#4
09-20-2012, 08:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
As Adam said really hard to judge the ones on ebay because everyone has different scanner settings, I have bought a number of them thinking they were black only to be 1926 blues. Some of them are just plain tough to tell apart vs others very easy, the Ruth is easy but other like the Culyer is real hard. Having them in hand is the only real way to tell for sure.
As I said in another thread the grading companies got lots of them wrong, esp PSA, heck I just think they slab any with a box as 1925. I know SGC is trying hard to be correct as they had called me twice recently when grading Gehrigs to make sure they got them right.
|
|
#5
09-20-2012, 08:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's a good point, Scott. Many are obvious but some are not and unfortunately for me, the Cuyler that I am questioning is one of the most difficult to tell. Here are 5 of mine, 2 that I am quite certain are 1925's and 2 that have to be 1926's as they were not produced in 1925 along with the Cuyler in question.
|
|
#6
09-20-2012, 08:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Phil can you scan them at the same time, put the culyer in the middle with a 1925 on one side and a 26 on the other. I will post an example where the left is a 26 Bancroft, the right is a 25 Bancroft and as you can see the Cobb in the middle is a 1926-
Last edited by smtjoy; 09-20-2012 at 08:41 AM.
|
|
#7
09-20-2012, 09:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scott:
Good idea, I don't have the cards handy as I keep them in safe deposit boxes. Next time I can get to them, I'll try that. Of course, this idea assumes that the 1925(s) has/have been identified correctly as I know that the 1926's must be correct. Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 09-20-2012 at 09:24 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1926 Exhibits Ruth Question | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 08-31-2012 12:45 AM |
| Wanted: 1926 or 1925 Bill Terry Exhibit | Matt | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-06-2010 06:33 PM |
| 1925 or 1926 Exhibit question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 11-28-2007 01:55 PM |
| 1921, 1926, and 1928 HOF Exhibits for sale or trade | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 03-14-2006 01:35 PM |
| 1925 Exhibits Sports Champion Ruth (w469) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-16-2005 10:10 AM |
Hybrid Mode
