Let's Talk E90-1

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Bosox Blair

Ted,

What do you make of the fact that E92 Dockman features Shean as a Boston NL player (if anything)? I have seen Dockman dated as a 1909 set...so if Ramly had Boston (including Shean) locked up with contracts, Dockman didn't care? Or maybe Dockman is a 1910 set too?

Interesting since the E92 poses overlap with E90-1 as well...

Cheers,
Blair

Blair

I am not sure I understand.....David Shean is not pictured in the Ramly set. Please clarify ?

Shean was traded from the Phillies to the Boston Doves on July 16, 1909.

And is it possible that the Dockman set was produced in 1910 (instead of 1909) ? Perhaps, Yes.

We have discovered that some of the E-sets have been mis-dated. For example, the E90-1 set
is catalogued as 1909-1911. My research indicates that it should be dated as a 1908-1910 set.


TED Z

[tedzan]

As the "myth" claims....Wagner was an anti-cigarette guy. So, with his appearance on most of the E-cards,
can we assume that he was quite fond of caramel candy


..



TED Z

[Bosox Blair]

Originally Posted by tedzan

Blair

I am not sure I understand.....David Shean is not pictured in the Ramly set. Please clarify ?

Shean was traded from the Phillies to the Boston Doves on July 16, 1909.

And is it possible that the Dockman set was produced in 1910 (instead of 1909) ? Perhaps, Yes.

We have discovered that some of the E-sets have been mis-dated. For example, the E90-1 set
is catalogued as 1909-1911. My research indicates that it should be dated as a 1908-1910 set.


TED Z

Hi Ted,

I was just referring back to your earlier post in this thread (#19) where you listed Shean as one of the tougher late-issued E90-1 cards and you stated in that post your theory that Ramly had the rights to these players for 1909. I understood you to be including Shean and also quite a few others in your list who did not actually have Ramly cards, like Tris Speaker, etc.

Maybe I'm not clear on what your theory is?

I take your point on the dating of sets...some could be either 1909 or 1910 depending on what time of year they were issued.

Cheers,
Blair

[TheBig6]

Rob, Good luck with the set should you decide.
It's a great set and prices are alot more reasonable than they were a few years ago. Rarties excluded.
Heres my few examples

[ScottFandango]

there is so much to talk about/debate in this set...

good stuff...

one of the rarest cards has not been mentioned:

stone LH ...less than 20 graded copies!!! wow