|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: I | |||
| like the Gypsy Queen Ruth |
|
40 | 28.37% |
| don't like the Gypsy Queen Ruth |
|
61 | 43.26% |
| don't really care either way |
|
40 | 28.37% |
| Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I voted that I like the GQ Ruth, but I don't like this leather variation. It gives it that canvas look that ruins the photo. This one is much better:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2012-Topps-G...item337c263fed |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree Matt, the one in the link you posted is better looking to me as well.
Sincerely, Clayton |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it would have a better look if it were in black and white the blue hat and socks stick out like a sore thumb.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like the original but I like the one Matthew posted even more. And I agree, the thought didn't escape me on it potentially helping the pre-war hobby. I like almost anything that will help folks get excited about our hobby.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really like the Gypsy Queen minis. I have several of the Cincinnati Reds cards from this set, including a handful of autographs.
I like the Ruth image and those Mini Leather cards have a really cool texture to them. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
It would be a lot better if it had some saw dust from a game-used bat or something . . .
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I kind of like the way it looks, I've always liked the grittier pictures on baseball cards, hell on anything for that matter.
Defiently wouldn't fork out 250 for it though. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think I would have liked it more if the colors were the same as the originals...
Ricky Y |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting thread. Does anyone with a VCP account have some completed auction realized prices to share for this Ruth and any of the other Pre-war HOFers /10 in that Gypsy Queen mini leather set? It would be nice to know what the market values these cards. Thanks.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting numbers. I wonder if the card being polled were the one Matthew showed later in this thread, would the numbers be materially different?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like some new cards with vintage players, but I had to vote against the OP card. It just didn't grab me at all.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Since I do collect those leather minis, I obviously voted "like."
![]() I do happen to have that Babe Ruth leather mini #ed 01/10. Overpaid $150 for it but passion made me do it. Actually, there's another Babe Ruth card in the set...the Boston version which has a cooler image: ![]() By the way, this set of 350 leather minis happen to be my final collecting project (although, I'm very tempted to go after next year's Gypsy Queen wood minis #ed to 5) and managed to get 156 out of 350 to date...all numbered either 01/10 or 10/10. Just something I really enjoy collecting. Last edited by FrostyCollects; 10-07-2012 at 06:50 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1962 Topps Babe Ruth Special | GKreindler | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-13-2009 02:31 PM |
| FS/FT 1971 Topps FB SGC Lot of 111 !!! Offers Please. | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-31-2009 09:12 PM |
| 1950-1980 singles at fair prices | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2008 06:20 PM |
| 1950-1980 singles(baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-15-2008 11:08 PM |
| UPDATED 1951-1969 BASEBALL SINGLES FS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-04-2008 11:12 AM |