![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just Googled some DIY directions and made my own bush league version. Basically a cardboard box with sides cut out and some thin foam (old packing material) to kill any glare. Grabbed a couple of cheap lights from the hardware store and it's just a piece of construction paper for the background.
You could surely get much better results with a store bought version or a better homemade version. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jeff,
I am by no means a professional photographer, but in my experience, the biggest difficulties with photographing photos, magazines or other flat items are 1) glare from lights and 2) keeping the item flat while keeping the camera at 90 degrees to the item. A light box helps a lot with #1, but presents even more difficulties for #2 unless it is large and specifically made to deal with flat items. Placing a card on a stand is one thing, but getting a curled 8x10 photo or a floppy magazine to stand up straight for the shot is a whole other endeavor. I do use a light box/photo tent for 3-dimensional items (balls, statues, toys, etc), but find that it's tough to beat a good flatbed scanner when it comes to photos and other flat items. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I visited a map store today and asked them if they could create quality scans of oversized photos. They could not, but they gave me a couple of businesses' names that I'll check out this week. Will get back with the results.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott,
Something I hadn't thought of when you asked about the oversized photos before is you might check with a duplication/print shop. When I was working in civil engineering, we occasionally had to scan full-sized sets of plans (24"x36") and would have them done at such a place. I would caution though that such places are not accustomed to dealing with high-priced collectibles, and depending on the dimensions of your photos, the scanning would probably be done in a pass-through arrangement rather than an oversized flatbed scanner. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott, I recently had a 16x20 original team photo scanned by a professional photo restoration shop. They used a large format flatbed scanner for the job but still had to scan it in two passes. They stitched the image back together and you could never tell where the line is. The service cost $40 and I got a DVD with the image. The file size is huge (1.5GB) which helps tremendously with touch ups and the quality of the image if I were to do a digital reprint of it down the road. I imagine an image that will fit onto a flatbed scanner without having to be stitched together would be much cheaper.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks William. I'll be bringing in about 25 photos, so if there's no 'stitching together' required, I'm hoping the volume will keep the price reasonable.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale A Portrait of Baseball Photography | 71buc | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 3 | 08-10-2012 08:08 AM |
Type 1 Baseball Photography Group on Facebook | Forever Young | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 04-05-2010 12:19 PM |
Novelty Cutlery/ Vignos & Hurford Photography | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-13-2008 06:59 PM |
Vintage Photography Forum | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-22-2004 10:08 PM |
Trick Photography & Oddball Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-08-2004 07:53 PM |