The National

[Exhibitman]

Anaheim was 2006.

It drives me crazy too. What it boils down to are:

1. Cheap venue rentals.

2. No union labor requiring dealers to pay for set-up help.

3. Lots of east coast dealers who drive to the shows and don't want to drive west of the Mississippi.

[HaloFan]

Originally Posted by Exhibitman

Anaheim was 2006.

It drives me crazy too. What it boils down to are:

1. Cheap venue rentals.

2. No union labor requiring dealers to pay for set-up help.

3. Lots of east coast dealers who drive to the shows and don't want to drive west of the Mississippi.

Yeah, I'm in California as well. These above answers is what I got when I asked a dealer in Michigan about this. I'm hearing the committee is considering bringing it out to the West in the near future, but they keep saying Anaheim will not allow the convention due to commitment issues and guarantees. The '06 convention wasn't very good, but that had a lot to do to with having it land on Baseball Hall of Fame Induction weekend which was dumb on the promotors part. Hardly any baseball players were available if I remembered. It was unusually hot that whole week if I remember. The dealers probably expected 70-80 degrees as more solace after leaving their hot humid region back home and didn't get it adding to the problems.

I remembered talking with a dealer from Iowa and she said it took them 23 hours to trek from Des Moines all the way to SoCal. I think that if Anaheim is such a problem, then LA(where the first one was), San Diego or at least Phoenix, Denver or Vegas could be an alternative. I mean Comi Con does great and it's in San Diego. I think like the Michigan dealer told me there is more things at work in regards to snubbing the West.

Craig H

[4reals]

I didn't realize the '06 National was out here, how did I miss that? Maybe that's why it did so poor...weak marketing.

If the weather is one of the issues in deciding, I hear that there's this wonderful new contraption called an air conditioner that makes buildings cold. It's really quite amazing!

Yeah, but seriously, temperature is never a problem in S.D., S.F., or Denver. I could understand Phoenix or Vegas getting crossed off the list for that problem.

[Jay Wolt]

The weather is probably not a consideration as the last Baltimore National was a steambox outside and probably will be again next week

[Steve_NY]

It comes down to economics.

Simply put, National spot holders are given the option to opt for missing one show every five years, and maintaining their priority count.

In 2006, many east coast dealers opted out of the National.

I would support a location that is more centrally located, but would have to opt out again if it was in the West Coast.

The fact remains that many of the premier dealers in the country are getting "older" and driving 3 days is not a pleasant thought.

I would also support a National show in 2 distinct locations -- one on the East Coast and one on the West Coast. Then I could decide to do one ofr both in any year.

These thoughts have all been debated before -- and we have what we have.

Steve

[Jaybird]

Originally Posted by Steve_NY

It comes down to economics.

Simply put, National spot holders are given the option to opt for missing one show every five years, and maintaining their priority count.

In 2006, many east coast dealers opted out of the National.

I would support a location that is more centrally located, but would have to opt out again if it was in the West Coast.

The fact remains that many of the premier dealers in the country are getting "older" and driving 3 days is not a pleasant thought.

I would also support a National show in 2 distinct locations -- one on the East Coast and one on the West Coast. Then I could decide to do one ofr both in any year.

These thoughts have all been debated before -- and we have what we have.

Steve

Interesting discussion. I'm not sure I like the East Coast/West Coast thing. I think it would dilute the show and possibly make both falter. I like the one National gathering where we can all get together. It really is a great time. I also don't mind traveling to different cities wherever they may be.

For some reason, maybe I'm crazy, but I think West Coasters are more open to travel than East Coasters. It's a generality but I think we're used to traveling more often to get somewhere and often by plane. Perhaps this isn't as much the case with East Coasters. Anyway, I'd just love to see a variety and a traveling show. Had a great time in Chicago, will do so in Baltimore.

Would also love to see Kansas City, Albuquerque, Oklahoma City, Austin, Tampa Bay, etc.

[4reals]

Unfortunately, it comes down to economics for me as well. I would love to be able to afford to fly across the country, get a hotel room and eat out for 3 or 4 days but I have a humble income and if I spent that kind of money I would have nothing left for card purchases.

You know, there could be good money made for East Coasters willing to shop at the National for West Coast guys. You know, just charge a small finders fee or something. Anything like that already exist?

[mark evans]

Although I live in the D.C. suburbs, I agree that the West Coast folks get a raw deal. Perhaps Las Vegas would offer an attractive venue for everyone.

Hope to see all for dinner.