![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
JimB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I, too, thought it was scrap that was hand cut. If that is the case, and given the fact that it is oversized, would you trim it down to size with a more precision (straighter) cut? After all, the grading company is going to label it "Trimmed" either way so you might as well have a straighter cut.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OPTIONS: (a non-exhaustive list)
1- Keep the card as an object lesson on why one should forgo graded cards; and from now on don't collect graded cards. 2- Send the thing back and ask for a refund if you're unhappy with it; then refrain from buying ungraded cards. 3- Keep the card and be unhappy with it; let it serve as a perpetual reminder to you to never, ever again buy an ungraded card, because you don't care for ungraded cards. The card has a non-factory, uneven cut. I can't imagine that it is printer's scrap, that's just wishful thinking. If it was mine, I'd think I paid too much for it, and that it is just fine as it is... paying to have it graded would be overspending some more, and a waste of money. I could well see what it is without it being in a slab, as can you. I don't see back up there in the prior posts where someone says they have no clue as to what it is, but if it were slabbed then they'd know. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
seem to be hand cut. i know i had a number a few years ago when you really got no to very little premium and all seemed to be hand cut a long time ago.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd keep it as-is. I wouldn't bother with slabbing, unless they would slab as missing color or wrong color. I don't see that happening anytime soon.
I definetly wouldn't trim it more to even out the handcut edge. That edge is part of its appeal to an error collector. Steve B |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't see why some feel it is a missing colors card. Look at this one for $25 on ebay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-11-T206...#ht_553wt_1185
It looks similar to yours, except a little brighter. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, I wouldn't trim it again. I'm probably just going to keep it for now, without grading. Thanks everyone for your input.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I got this email back from SGC (Bob Luce): " Unfortunately, we can not note your T206 Bob Groom as a color variation on our label. To reduce potential liabilities, we have decided to only label 100% indisputable color variations. We will leave any subtle variations to be sorted out by seller and buyer in the marketplace." I, too, believe the card could come back as altered because of a bad top. So I have decided to keep it raw. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad card sold by 4_sharp_corners | HBroll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-18-2009 04:28 PM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
ca. 1927 Tabacalera La Morena Ruth & Gehrig card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-27-2008 08:08 AM |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |