![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For me, if I were still collecting Rookie HOF'ers I would consider either Sporting News card to be his rookie. Issued in the same year would probably be what I would look for. Heck, who really knows when a person actually received the card the first time? A M101-4 could have gotten into their hands before a M101-5 just because of when they physically received the card. A few weeks or months certainly wouldn't matter to me. Great info folks and thanks again Todd for your in depth knowledge sharing.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like Leon said, issued during the same year, both are Rookie Cards.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would think that if Topps issues an Update set in the same year, rookie cards in the base set would be superior to the Update set. That's why I think m101-5 is better than m101-4 if the cards can be differentiated.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
to ebay E91 Plank along with Neilson's Sisler and Heilman FS | alaskapaul3 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 02-05-2012 07:33 PM |
FS: Ty Cobb Auto JSA + George Sisler 1916 Rookie PSA | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 10-17-2008 01:48 PM |
Grimes and Sisler exhibits for sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-10-2006 10:13 AM |
Sisler w575-2, Mrs Sherlocks pins etc. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-21-2006 05:42 PM |
E121 and E120 Sisler for sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-26-2006 09:40 AM |