![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Additionally, since the 10 is sandwiched between two 8s based on the sequential cert numbers (note to OP who thinks there are only 3 Wagners when there were 46 graded from this find) how did the 10 get switched with an 8.5? My understanding is that cards get assigned cert numbers upon receipt and for good reason are left in order in the boxes once graded. Flips are printed and cards are holdered in order. Greg |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe the cards got out of order and it was a mistake?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-07-2012 at 12:15 PM. Reason: grammar |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Once again praise praise praise for PSA making a mistake. This time enough attention had been brought to the card to warrant looking further into it. Heck it isn't tough to find a so called 8 or high to call it a 10 make the switch and say all is fine.
If these were modern cards they would be lucky to get an 8 with the registry being off and the color bleeding off the borders. So much attention is given to sharp corners and centering it is ridiculous. The 10 has obvious immediate visual defects I just don't get how the cards warrant the applied grades. The card in the first 10 holder that is know an 8.5 has so many obvious defects (the big one is the extra red color on the back plus the other defects mentioned in the 10 card.I don't know how it warrants anything more than a 6. Great looking cards but not to the level of the grades. If you think so that is your and opinion and you are free to spend your money as such. To me I am not in this game, even if I could afford it. Lee
__________________
Tired of Ebay or looking for a place to sell your cards, let SterlingSportsAuctions.com do the work for you, monthly auctions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great looking cards but not to the level of the grades.
Lee[/QUOTE] I agree, the first thing I noticed about this card is the imperfect registration. It is a beautiful card but not a 10. dave |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To me, the whole concept of the 10 (or 98) grade is meaningless and rather arbitrary (although great marketing). If a card is Mint it should be essentially flawless, so the notion of an even higher grade makes no sense.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the human eye can distinguish between PSA/SGC/Beckett Mint (9/96/9) and Gem Mint (10/98/9.5), but can anyone tell me how to distinguish Gem Mint from Pristine (??/100/10)? The fact that SGC and BGS even have a Pristine grade would lead us to believe that there are flaws in Gem Mint cards. Now that makes no sense Peter.
Last edited by 4815162342; 07-07-2012 at 12:59 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do we know when and how they are going to start selling the Cobb PSA 9s? Sorry if its been told already. Would love to put some bids on a few.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Black Swamp Find? | 4815162342 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 241 | 06-23-2013 04:24 AM |
Ozzie Smith Collection For Sale - All PSA 9 & 10 | ledsters | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 10-23-2009 09:13 PM |
for sale: e98 wagner psa 3 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 05-18-2008 01:14 PM |
f/s: e98 wagner psa 3...now on ebay | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 11-08-2007 11:07 PM |
Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 05:51 PM |