 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
07-05-2012, 12:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It seems my question should've been : "why did this Sisler finish so low?" Are "rookie" cards really that big in pre-war, or is the Sisler more scarce than other M101-4, -5's ? 
|
|
#4
07-05-2012, 12:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
|
|
#5
07-05-2012, 02:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
the card hardly come up in lower grade. i had a snipe but imo it sold for what it should have. i also consider all the m101 his rookie, but prefer the "P" designation more than the "1b".
__________________
One post max per thread.
|
|
#6
07-05-2012, 04:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had the high bid on this card for most of the day. I just threw a twenty spot at it and lo and behold it was the high bid. I knew that it wouldn't hold up. I intended to bid again later. Kinda slipped my mind. I was here reading threads. When I found the outbid notification in my inbox, I went over to check and it was sitting at like 59 bucks. I stepped away from the computer for a butt and to decide what bid to make and when I returned, it was over. For the record, I didn't realize it was his RC. I was out-gunned.
|
|
#7
07-07-2012, 11:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yep - I won this one...have been looking for a low grade example of this "rookie" card for a while now.
sorry to disappoint other board members. I was hoping it would finish lower than $300, but couldn't pass it up at that price. I've seen far too many go for > $500. I hope it's legit. I haven't received it yet. Also, one member mentioned that the M101-5 is "older" than the M101-4. Why, then, does the M101-4 show #164, but the M101-5 shows #166. It would seem logical that M101-4 is older, then? Are there other threads here that suggest the M101-5 pre-dates the M101-4?
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180)
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| to ebay E91 Plank along with Neilson's Sisler and Heilman FS | alaskapaul3 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 02-05-2012 07:33 PM |
| FS: Ty Cobb Auto JSA + George Sisler 1916 Rookie PSA | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 10-17-2008 01:48 PM |
| Grimes and Sisler exhibits for sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-10-2006 10:13 AM |
| Sisler w575-2, Mrs Sherlocks pins etc. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-21-2006 05:42 PM |
| E121 and E120 Sisler for sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-26-2006 09:40 AM |
Hybrid Mode
