T206 carolina brights...why not higher prices??

[Rob D.]

If nothing else, Rawn, you could always "create" a CB Carrigan with the appropriate front and back scans. It's the next best thing to having one, especially if the card in question doesn't exist.

[carrigansghost]

I only go for the real cards, Rob. We have TPG'ers to ensure this right?

Rawn

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by carrigansghost

I only go for the real cards, Rob. We have TPG'ers to ensure this right?

Rawn

TPGers and T206 scholars keep the collecting world safe, Rawn.

[wonkaticket]

Not sure what is more disappointing at this point. The fact that Ted has been caught in some tall tales with non-confirmed cards and bogus scans. Or the fact that the same inside joke about Ted's situation has to be played over and over and over so 2-3 people can have a chuckle fest over something that has been beaten to death here ad nauseum.

I think it’s safe to say perhaps both have jumped the shark at this point wouldn't you agree?

Cheers,

John

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Not sure what is more disappointing at this point. The fact that Ted has been caught in some tall tales with non-confirmed cards and bogus scans. Or the fact that the same inside joke about Ted's situation has to be played over and over and over so 2-3 people can have a chuckle fest over something that has been beaten to death here ad nauseum.

I think it’s safe to say perhaps both have jumped the shark at this point wouldn't you agree?

Cheers,

John

Let he who has not beaten a dead horse cast the first whip.

Cheers.

[wonkaticket]

Rob not saying I havn't given Ted my fair share of lumps, did it when it was time....and then a bit beyond. But even I moved on from it I'm not following the guy thread to thread with the same one liner and inside joke.

John

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Rob not saying I havn't given Ted my fair share of lumps, did it when it was time....and then a bit beyond. But even I moved on from it I'm not following the guy thread to thread with the same one liner and inside joke.

John

No one is questioning your classiness, John. Or your PhotoShop skills.

[carrigansghost]

I wake thanking both parties every morning, Rob.

Rawn

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

If nothing else, Rawn, you could always "create" a CB Carrigan with the appropriate front and back scans. It's the next best thing to having one, especially if the card in question doesn't exist.

Rob, you are correct I do want good hobby information nothing has changed. Love when good information is posted.

I guess with my search light in the dark I missed where the above was anything more than brining up Ted’s past issues for simple shits and giggles and a cyber-slap to stir the pot. Guess I failed to see how ragging Ted just one more time made the hobby a better place and how the above statement was filled with good hobby information. Rob no offense don’t put icing on a turd and sell to me as chocolate cake it’s silly. You were trying to get a raise out of Ted nothing more man up.

I simply said ughhh let it go, then we disagreed it’s that simple don’t try and spin the above into some deeper meaning noble hobby cause.

I want to be clear here as well. I’m not giving Ted a pass or asking one to forgive and forget either. I’m just as offended with Ted’s past actions on a few things as anyone else is perhaps more. But sooner or later it’s time to just let it go IMO.

Ted is here and he’s not going anywhere I don’t think busting his balls each and every time he pops up is making anything any better.

All I’m saying…I would think someone like yourself would agree.

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Rob, you are correct I do want good hobby information nothing has changed. Love when good information is posted.

I guess with my search light in the dark I missed where the above was anything more than brining up Ted’s past issues for simple shits and giggles and a cyber-slap to stir the pot. Guess I failed to see how ragging Ted just one more time made the hobby a better place and how the above statement was filled with good hobby information. Rob no offense don’t put icing on a turd and sell to me as chocolate cake it’s silly. You were trying to get a raise out of Ted nothing more man up.

I simply said ughhh let it go, then we disagreed it’s that simple don’t try and spin the above into some deeper meaning noble hobby cause.

I want to be clear here as well. I’m not giving Ted a pass or asking one to forgive and forget either. I’m just as offended with Ted’s past actions on a few things as anyone else is perhaps more. But sooner or later it’s time to just let it go IMO.

Ted is here and he’s not going anywhere I don’t think busting his balls each and every time he pops up is making anything any better.

All I’m saying…I would think someone like yourself would agree.

John,

To boil it down: You found fault with me posting links to accurate checklists. I reasoned that if you're interested about truthfulness and integrity, posting accurate information should be seen as valuable. You follow up by taking the discussion in a different direction, which seems to be the go-to move in many T206 threads here.

"ughhh let it go" ... coming from you, that's truly priceless.

[tedzan]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

John,

You found fault with me posting links to accurate checklists. I reasoned that if you're interested about truthfulness and integrity, posting accurate information should be seen as valuable. You follow up by taking the discussion in a different direction, which seems to be the go-to move in many T206 threads here.

Rob

John is correct.....everytime I post on Net54, you follow-up my posts with your sarcastic and snide comments. It's a sick obsession of yours. All of us have seen you
do this to others in the past on this forum. You do not contribute much that is meaningful.....rather you choose to be a negative dude.

Regarding your questioning my T206 lists on this forum. You forget that many T206 collectors contributed their expertise to these lists that I have generated these 8
years on this Network. Therefore, in affect you are questioning their integrity, as well as mine.

I have bumped up my "Consolidated T206 front/back lists".......4000+ permutations.....READ IT !

Then SMART-A$$.....tell us of the "errors".....and, tell us of the so-called bits of "mis-information" that you claim I have posted in these lists ? ?


TED Z

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by tedzan

Rob

John is correct.....everytime I post on Net54, you follow-up my posts with your sarcastic and snide comments. It's a sick obsession of yours. All of us have seen you
do this to others in the past on this forum. You do not contribute much that is meaningful.....rather you choose to be a negative dude.

Regarding your questioning my T206 lists on this forum. You forget that many T206 collectors contributed their expertise to these lists that I have generated these 8
years on this Network. Therefore, in affect you are questioning their integrity, as well as mine.

I have bumped up my "Consolidated T206 front/back lists".......4000+ permutations.....READ IT !

Then SMART-A$$.....tell us of the "errors".....and, tell us of the so-called bits of "mis-information" that you claim I have posted in these lists ? ?


TED Z

Ted,

Just be thankful that more than a few people have showed restraint when it comes to some of your posts.

[tedzan]

Have fun trying to come up with errors on my T206 T-brand lists. Have you started reading it yet ?

Hey....this is my 8th year on Net54 and I have met many, many decent fellow collectors. And, then
there is a handful of "jerks" like you, that we try to avoid. But, then that's life.

I have found at least 2 errors (so far) in the T206Resource "checklists"......so, you can climb down
from your "high and mighty" pedestal.


T-Rex TED

[Abravefan11]

Ted - I'm not going to get into a back and forth with you as I've told you it only serves to make everyone involved look bad. If you're aware of errors on our checklist just say what they are and we'll correct them.

I haven't gone over yours in detail but two quick one's I'd question would be Shipke brown Hindu and Lajoie (w/ bat) black Lenox.

Edit: Please don't rehash the red Hindu Cobb.

[wonkaticket]

"OK, John, I give up. I'm unable to survive the Wonka Vortex.Ted must have taught you well as you both whiled away the hours behind your table at the Philly show. You've become a master at challenging points that haven't been made, changing direction when there's no other alternative and assigning false motive and thoughts.So rather than try to keep up, I'll just say thanks. Thank you for being the example that the rest of us can strive to become. Thank you for always taking the high road. "

Yawn. Yep you figured it all out Rob. All done here it’s clear you have no intention of trying to understand what I was trying to say.

This is just about being on teams, taking sides and carrying a torch of some old Ted bullshit all wrapped up and disguised into some better hobby better world wrapper with a bow on it. The discussion here as of post #13 had nothing to do with hobby progression let me know when it does.

John

[atx840]

Interesting thread, I also think CBs are undervalued and they will likely continue to rise, even faster then Hindus and AB460s.

I have bugged Ted on this in the past and recently changed a post as it was a dick move on my part. For the majority Ted, you put up great information and start interesting threads. Thank you.

[wonkaticket]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

If nothing else, Rawn, you could always "create" a CB Carrigan with the appropriate front and back scans. It's the next best thing to having one, especially if the card in question doesn't exist.

Rob, what you just posted is an incorrect statement. I said nothing negative about any links to lists. The thread clearly shows that.

My only comment to you was on your quote above.

It’s you that have decided to spin your shot aimed at Ted on the same old Ted stuff into some grand hobby noble effort of championing good information. Which you know it was not, it was nothing more than a shot meant to raise a reaction or get under Ted’s skin. Not saying there isn’t some truth in your venom aimed at Ted…but at least call it for what it is and don’t hide behind so called good hobby intentions.

In the end you have the right to say whatever you want to anyone just as I have the right to say ughh. It's clear we disagree on bringing up the Ted faked scan and list mistakes over and over that’s ok with me happy to disagree.

As for my integrity as well as my views on truthfulness in the hobby and accurate information they remain the same.

John

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by wonkaticket

Rob, what you just posted is an incorrect statement. I said nothing negative about any links to lists. The thread clearly shows that.

My only comment to you was on your quote above.

It’s you that have decided to spin your shot aimed at Ted on the same old Ted stuff into some grand hobby noble effort of championing good information. Which you know it was not, it was nothing more than a shot meant to raise a reaction or get under Ted’s skin. Not saying there isn’t some truth in your venom aimed at Ted…but at least call it for what it is and don’t hide behind so called good hobby intentions.

In the end you have the right to say whatever you want to anyone just as I have the right to say ughh. It's clear we disagree on bringing up the Ted faked scan and list mistakes over and over that’s ok with me happy to disagree.

As for my integrity as well as my views on truthfulness in the hobby and accurate information they remain the same.

John

OK, John, I give up. I'm unable to survive the Wonka Vortex.

Ted must have taught you well as you both whiled away the hours behind your table at the Philly show. You've become a master at challenging points that haven't been made, changing direction when there's no other alternative and assigning false motive and thoughts.

So rather than try to keep up, I'll just say thanks. Thank you for being the example that the rest of us can strive to become. Thank you for always taking the high road.