 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
06-25-2012, 02:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I don't know much about the lithographic process, but in order to have multiple numbers of a given player on a sheet, wouldn't it require multiple stones for that player? And doesn't it require different stones for each color? It seems like that is a lot of extra stones and less economical than having a single set of stones for each player. Please understand I'm not doubting your knowledge, I'm just hoping that with your knowledge you can enlighten me a bit. Thanks and best regards, Craig
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Uzit vs. Red Hindu | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-16-2010 09:37 PM |
| WTB any low grade T206 Red Hindu, Brown Hindu, Lenox, Uzit | Blunder19 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-16-2010 11:34 AM |
| T206 AMERICAN BEAUTY 460 sub-set survey....MISSION COMPLETE | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 118 | 03-30-2010 11:19 AM |
| WTB T206 Red Hindu, Drum, Uzit backs | Blunder19 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-28-2010 07:31 AM |
| WTT Red Hindu and/or other cards for Uzit back | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-02-2008 11:19 PM |
Threaded Mode