Should these be considered/catalogged as a food issue?

[ALR-bishop]

Neat item Whitey. I had never seen them before.

I think with Bob's retirement, cataloging at SCD may have come to a halt. I am holding on to my 2011 and 2012 catalogs

[whiteymet]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Neat item Whitey. I had never seen them before.

I think with Bob's retirement, cataloging at SCD may have come to a halt. I am holding on to my 2011 and 2012 catalogs

Al: Thanks for the reply! I would think others on Net54 would have some of these. But so far no response.

[cwazzy]

Cool items! Can I see the ones from the Dodgers if you get a chance?

Edit: Cardinals too if possible.

[whiteymet]

Originally Posted by cwazzy

Cool items! Can I see the ones from the Dodgers if you get a chance?

Edit: Cardinals too if possible.

Your wish is my command!! Sorry for the flash!

Cardinals 1955, Dodgers 1954 with no year sign in front, 1955 with Campanella lower right, 1956 with Furillo lower right.

Now lets see others from your guys collections from this set.

And back to my original question, should these be a food issue and have a F- designation?

[David W]

Are these on cardboard stock, or more like a photo paper stock?

[whiteymet]

Originally Posted by David W

Are these on cardboard stock, or more like a photo paper stock?

Heavier than paper stock, lighter than cardboard!

[cwazzy]

Those are awesome! I'd never seen those before. But now I have to find some. LOL

Thanks for posting the pics!