|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I don't know if he cheated or not; I wasn't there. Therefore, my opinion would only be a guess. I haven't listened to the facts, like the jury. If after hearing the facts they thought that there was not compelling evidence that he did steroids then I must guess that he did not. Peter--I was just making the point that if O'Keefe could make an open and shut case, based on facts and not assumptions, that Clemens juiced then the prosecution could have probably made a strong argument, a winning argument, that he was guilty. Obviously, that was not the case. Mattingly had half a HOF career. Unfortunately, a bad back killed the second half. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			The jury didn't decide he didn't use steroids though. They decided it wasn't proven he lied about using steroids. There's a big difference. It's hard to prove someone lied about something you can't prove without a doubt they did. The point of the Mitchell Report was both to inform baseball what was going on and to inform the fans of what their favorite players have been up to. If you refuse to acknowledge any of the report's information because it can't be proven, then I think you are missing the point. At the same token you can't prove anyone didn't use steroids. Last edited by packs; 06-18-2012 at 05:37 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Also I think the Mitchell report was a huge joke and 90% biased against NY teams. | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Bonds.... 
			
			How can anyone with a head the size of a medicine ball have his health in front of him?
		 | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			The jury has to consider facts. The Mitchell Report was based on conversations between investigators, personnel and players. The burden of proof in a courtroom is different. If you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that everything McNamee said is true, that doesn't mean it isn't true.
		 Last edited by packs; 06-18-2012 at 07:00 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 
				__________________ Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.  My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Yep.  Never used 'em.  And thought that Piazza's broken bat was a baseball, so he grabbed it and threw it at him.  Thinking back on this, a) how the heck was he not thrown out of the game and suspended and b) how come no one suspected Roid Rage at that time? In retrospect, the people I feel sorry for are the guys who played clean and would have been considered the best of their decade, if the top ten (or twenty) players hadn't been cheating. Sad part is, we'll never know who they were for certain. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Roger Hooper - Guilty | Dalkiel | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 09-27-2011 08:58 PM | 
| Roger Clemens, Rollie Fingers, Roberto Alomar, Mike Schmidt, Dave Justice auto graphs | rye22king | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-28-2010 11:38 PM | 
| Nice baseball autograph - roger clemens, roberto alomar, rollie fingers | rye22king | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-27-2010 09:49 AM | 
| -SOLD- 1984 TCMA Pawtucket Red Sox set of 25 Featuring Roger Clemens | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-20-2008 08:05 AM | 
| Roger Clemens Vs Barry Bonds??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 12-19-2007 02:52 PM |