![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: I think there is a ___% chance this is altered? | |||
It is not altered- (0%) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.47% |
10% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 2.78% |
20% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 4.17% |
30% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 3.47% |
40% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 2.08% |
50% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 11.81% |
60% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 5.56% |
70% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 8.33% |
80% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 11.11% |
90%-100% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
68 | 47.22% |
Voters: 144. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't know, can't tell from the scan. A beauty though!!!
Joe
__________________
![]() Collecting Detroit 19th Century N172, N173, N175. N172 Detroit. Getzein, McGlone, Rooks, Wheelock, Gillligan, Kid Baldwin Error, Lady Baldwin, Conway, Deacon White Positive transactions with Joe G, Jay Miller, CTANK80, BIGFISH, MGHPRO, k. DIXON, LEON, INSIDETHEWRAPPER, GOCUBSGO32, Steve Suckow, RAINIER2004, Ben Yourg, GNAZ01, yanksrnice09, cmiz5290, Kris Sweckard (Kris19),Angyal, Chuck Tapia,Belfast1933,bcbgcbrcb,fusorcruiser, tsp06, cobbcobb13 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What's left of it is a beauty
![]() ![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
50%
For me , i have not enough confidence in this company for afford a card at 18K graded by global Last edited by g_vezina_c55; 06-13-2012 at 11:37 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think Global has replaced PRO as the holder of last resort.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my experience cards not slabbed by the major TPG's are in these alternate slabs for a reason. However, without looking at the label and just looking at the card I think Ty's a bit thinner than when he started.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's easy to see the boarders are way too narrow.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like it has a very slight diamond cut left to right on top and the same left to right on bottom which to me suggests trimming. Otherwise it would be opposite (right to left) bottom and consistent.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Absolutely trimmed.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks trimmed or touched to me. I'm curious to know how the opinions would differ if this was in a PSA or SGC holder.
Last edited by Brendan; 06-13-2012 at 06:41 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Something is not right with this card, color/corner/edge could all been touched to make it look better
__________________
“Devoted to Bringing Quality Vintage Sports Cards and Memorabilia to the Hobby” https://www.ebay.com/str/jbsportsauctions |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The bottom border is almost certainly trimmed.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Some great opinions about the Cobb in here, but the fact is that nobody knows for sure. It seems like there is a reason that it is in GA holder and not one of the reputable grader's...
If this card was raw, I'm sure the opinions would not be as heavy on the side of being altered. The bottom edge looks like it could be a problem, but realistically there are so many shapes and sizes of T206's, how can anyone be close to 100% sure about this? I have seen T206's that look exactly the same in an SGC or PSA holder...the size doesn't look that bad. That being said, there is no way I would purchase a high dollar card in a holder other than the big three.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here we go again. I remember years ago when gai came into the market, many many people jumped to their service. They had the best grader in the business. Now they are called a non reputable grader. Why? Are the other grading co. more reputable? Is a company who would grade a suposed trimed Wagner card reputable? What is the % of cards misgraded by each company? None of you know! There always seems to be a witch hunt on this site. I don't own that card nor do I have anything to do with GA, but I think that card is good. Frank
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Grading Companies are the Best? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-14-2007 01:40 PM |
Grading strip cards and hand cut cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-06-2005 12:16 PM |
future of grading companies | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-22-2005 07:27 AM |
Grading Co. Burlesque | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-12-2003 09:18 PM |
Love them grading companies! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-10-2001 10:56 AM |