 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
06-09-2012, 02:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
From what you wrote, it would appear that it doesn't matter what the rest of us think. You probably will not be satisfied with anything short of a master set. FWIW, I personally think that you need examples of the high numbers for a basic set. If I'm not mistaken, the high numbers have different bio info on the back even though the fronts are the same. Also, to be complete, you probably need both Greenberg and Greenburg.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F/S 1956 Topps Complete Set | 25801wv | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2012 07:51 PM |
| FS: 1954 Bowman Complete Master Set: #4 | swanstars | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-05-2010 10:44 AM |
| Just needing 11 d311s left to complete my set! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 01-19-2010 09:26 PM |
| Needing 34 1911 Zeenuts to complete my set.... | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 07-24-2009 11:10 PM |
| So what is really considered having the complete set? T-206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-18-2008 11:45 AM |
Threaded Mode