 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
06-09-2012, 02:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
From what you wrote, it would appear that it doesn't matter what the rest of us think. You probably will not be satisfied with anything short of a master set. FWIW, I personally think that you need examples of the high numbers for a basic set. If I'm not mistaken, the high numbers have different bio info on the back even though the fronts are the same. Also, to be complete, you probably need both Greenberg and Greenburg.
|
|
#4
06-09-2012, 02:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
When these things start to become an aggravation it moves from being a hobby to self-torture.
I think the answer to your questions is yes, they are part of the set and to have a "complete" set you would need them. What you would have without them is a partial or low number set.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 06-10-2012 at 09:25 PM.
|
|
#5
06-09-2012, 02:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I used to collect Diamond Stars. I was working on putting together a complete set. My opinion at the time was that would include the high numbers. If I try it again, I'll try to complete it with the high numbers.
|
|
#6
06-09-2012, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's your collection, you get to do it as you want it. I have a t205 set without the stray line variations. Doesn't bother me in the least. I have a T206 519 working toward 520. It is unlikely I would get a Plank and honestly i think the Magie is overrated...and if I get to a 520, I'll be quite happy. You don't think it's complete? I don't care, it's my collection not yours.
__________________
Get my new book Baseball Cards at the Edge of War, 1941: The Games, The Gum and The Glory
|
|
#7
06-09-2012, 07:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Everyone have a personnal way to collect and build his set. And all way is corect!
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F/S 1956 Topps Complete Set | 25801wv | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2012 07:51 PM |
| FS: 1954 Bowman Complete Master Set: #4 | swanstars | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-05-2010 10:44 AM |
| Just needing 11 d311s left to complete my set! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 01-19-2010 09:26 PM |
| Needing 34 1911 Zeenuts to complete my set.... | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 07-24-2009 11:10 PM |
| So what is really considered having the complete set? T-206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 09-18-2008 11:45 AM |
Hybrid Mode
