![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
DAN's 4th Class Grading Company Kind of rolls off your tongue.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 06-02-2012 at 05:18 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sorry but email me and I will gladly "shut up" for you you know that |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dan,
I've seen quite a few T206s that have an irregular factory cut on the top like that. It's really not that unusual. Without an in-person visual examination of the card it's impossible to tell if it has been trimmed after the fact, but I would guess that it is not. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Really? Looks obvious to me after 43 years of collecting T206.
If the angle cut matches top and bottom then yes, I agree with you But with a straight bottom and a paper cutter top, this is blatantly HACKED! I promise you I would receive 100 authentics if I popped it and submitted it that many times. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If a card is on the bottom of the sheet, then it is possible to for the top and bottom angles to not match, correct?
... Is the Lajoie port on the bottom of the sheet? Last edited by 4815162342; 06-02-2012 at 05:59 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who knows if the cutters stopped 1 row befroe the bottom of the sheets or not??
Are you kidding me? If I submit this card it is "AUTHENTIC" PERIOD!!!!!! you have gotta be kidding me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is the real issue if this card is trimmed or if some people get preferential treatment at the grading companies?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dan,
I greatly admire your knowledge, passion, and enthusiasm for this great hobby but I think you're a bit off on this one. Both the top and bottom of the card are cut at the same angle, though the top is more pronounced. Again, not that unusual for someone who has viewed hundreds of thousands of T206s. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's the way I see at as well. I don't know why Dan keeps saying the bottom is straight when it's not. As much as I dislike PSA, I don't think the card is trimmed.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dan, from the scan it looks funky to me too. I am not getting into the fray though. And of course I don't care what you say about anything or anyone. Why should I care? You have a right to your opinion just like everyone else. See you at the National!!
I should add that I am not saying the card in question is trimmed. I don't know if it is or isn't. Anyone can see it has a funky cut.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 06-02-2012 at 06:27 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Deleted
Last edited by tedzan; 06-02-2012 at 06:58 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paper Loss at Tips of Corners | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-22-2011 03:18 PM |
WTT: HUGE tradelist of T205, T206, T207 & E90-1 | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 08-15-2009 10:43 AM |
1941 Play Ball - paper variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-25-2007 05:46 PM |
fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 02:09 AM |