![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rand
I was thinking about SGC, GAI, SCD, ect...How come PSA is the only company that uses qualifiers? I think its interesting about Beckett's sub grades and has a half point scale. What do you all think about (OC) (MK) (PD) ect...do you like them? how come the other companies do not use their own version? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Glyn Parson
MK is the only one i like or think is necessary. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve f
My simple belief is that all cards be 'Authenticated' and if applicable, tagged 'altered' if any Improvements are found. (The new Gretzky Honus owner may be able to sleep better?) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rand
I think the (oc) and (mc) sometimes over lap, i see alot of psa cards that could go either way, again, is it necessary? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Silly Post about PSA and Qualifiers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-25-2008 09:19 PM |
Looks like PSA finally got rid of qualifiers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-06-2006 05:41 PM |
What are all the qualifiers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-12-2005 04:40 PM |
PSA 1 Qualifiers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-01-2005 09:41 AM |
Did PSA originally not have qualifiers? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-07-2005 11:41 PM |